Pediatric bacterial keratitis: clinical features, causative organisms, and outcome during a 13-year study period

Waleed K. Alsarhani,Abdulmohsen Almulhim,Muhannad I. Alkhalifah,Arwa Z. Alromaih,Elham AlQahtani,Rahaf M. Al Malawi,Majed S. Alkharashi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.04.001
IF: 2.592
2024-05-19
Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology
Abstract:Objective To review the clinical features, causative organisms, complications, and outcomes of patients with pediatric bacterial keratitis at a tertiary care eye hospital. Methods We conducted a retrospective study at a tertiary care eye centre on clinically diagnosed pediatric patients with bacterial keratitis between 2007 and 2019. Poor outcomes were labelled if any of the following were present: final best-corrected visual acuity worse than 20/200, a drop in best-corrected visual acuity by 1 line or more, perforated corneas, endophthalmitis, and graft failure. Results The study included 43 cases of bacterial keratitis. Female and male patients represented 60.5% and 39.5% of the sample, respectively, with a mean age of 9.3 ± 5.9 years. The rate of culture positivity was 60.5%. The most common causative organisms were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (23.1%), Pseudomonas (23.1%), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (19.2%). Culture-positive bacterial keratitis was associated with infiltrates ≥2 mm ( p = 0.039), as determined by the results of multivariate analysis. Gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria exhibited 100% sensitivity to the tested fluoroquinolones. Complications included visually significant scars (55.8%), cataracts (14.0%), perforations (9.3%), corneal neovascularization (7.0%), nonhealing epithelial defects (7.0%), and endophthalmitis (4.7%). Corneal perforation was associated with the development of endophthalmitis ( p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with a poor outcome was poor presenting visual acuity ( p = 0.020). Conclusion Gram-positive bacteria were the most common cause of pediatric microbial keratitis. Positive cultures were associated with larger infiltrates. The only adverse prognostic factor was poor presenting vision.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?