Abstract:Motivation: Social media platforms centered around content creators (CCs) faced rapid growth in the past decade. Currently, millions of CCs make livable incomes through platforms such as YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram. As such, similarly to the job market, it is important to ensure the success and income (usually related to the follower counts) of CCs reflect the quality of their work. Since quality cannot be observed directly, two other factors govern the network-formation process: (a) the visibility of CCs (resulted from, e.g., recommender systems and moderation processes) and (b) the decision-making process of seekers (i.e., of users focused on finding CCs). Prior virtual experiments and empirical work seem contradictory regarding fairness: While the first suggests the expected number of followers of CCs reflects their quality, the second says that quality does not perfectly predict success. Results: Our paper extends prior models in order to bridge this gap between theoretical and empirical work. We (a) define a parameterized recommendation process which allocates visibility based on popularity biases, (b) define two metrics of individual fairness (ex-ante and ex-post), and (c) define a metric for seeker satisfaction. Through an analytical approach we show our process is an absorbing Markov Chain where exploring only the most popular CCs leads to lower expected times to absorption but higher chances of unfairness for CCs. While increasing the exploration helps, doing so only guarantees fair outcomes for the highest (and lowest) quality CC. Simulations revealed that CCs and seekers prefer different algorithmic designs: CCs generally have higher chances of fairness with anti-popularity biased recommendation processes, while seekers are more satisfied with popularity-biased recommendations. Altogether, our results suggest that while the exploration of low-popularity CCs is needed to improve fairness, platforms might not have the incentive to do so and such interventions do not entirely prevent unfair outcomes.

On the Optimality and Predictability of Cultural Markets with Social Influence

Measuring and Optimizing Cultural Markets

Stability and Efficiency of Personalised Cultural Markets

Predictability and Prediction for an Experimental Cultural Market

Predictability in an unpredictable artificial cultural market

Popularity signals in trial-offer markets with social influence and position bias

Market Segmentation in Online Platforms

On the Effectiveness of Social Proof Recommendations in Markets with Multiple Products

Optimal Pricing in Social Networks with Incomplete Information

How algorithmic popularity bias hinders or promotes quality

Consumers don't play dice, influence of social networks and advertisements

Assortment optimization under a multinomial logit model with position bias and social influence

Social network markets: the influence of network structure when consumers face decisions over many similar choices

A Cultural Market Model

A Complexity View of Markets with Social Influence

Fashion, Novelty and Optimality: An application from Physics

Statistical Discrimination in Ratings-Guided Markets

Interactive Learning with Pricing for Optimal and Stable Allocations in Markets

The role of luck in the success of social media influencers

Online influence maximization in non-stationary Social Networks

Optimal policy design for decision problems under social influence