Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein puncture for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: a meta-analysis enrolling 1257 patients

Giampaolo Vetta,Antonio Parlavecchio,Jennifer Wright,Michele Magnocavallo,Lorenzo Marcon,Ioannis Doundoulakis,Roberto Scacciavillani,Antonio Sorgente,Luigi Pannone,Alexandre Almorad,Juan Sieira,Charles Audiat,Kazutaka Nakasone,Gezim Bala,Erwin Ströker,Ingrid Overeinder,Pietro Rossi,Andrea Sarkozy,Gian-Battista Chierchia,Carlo de Asmundis,Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01932-6
2024-10-26
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Abstract:Ultrasound-guided (Echo-AVP) and Fluoroscopy-guided Axillary Vein Puncture (Fluoro-AVP) are both acknowledged as safe and effective techniques for transvenous implantation of leads for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Nonetheless, it is still debated which of the two techniques has a better safety and efficacy profile. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Echo-AVP versus Fluoro-AVP for CIEDs implantation.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?