Abstract:Background: Clear communication of medical risk helps to ensure proper patient understanding of healthcare options and supports informed decision-making. Communication involving visual and written risk typically conveys risk more effectively than conversations alone between a patient and a clinician. However, perception of risk is context-dependent, and the efficacy of and preferences for commonly-used risk communication formats are not well-understood during pregnancy, which is a time of complex decision-making. We sought to address this knowledge gap. Objective: This study aimed to assess pregnant and recently pregnant people's understanding and preferences for different risk communication formats. Study design: We conducted an open online REDCap survey of pregnant and recently pregnant people over a 1-month period in 2022. Study participants were aged 16 to 49 years, pregnant or recently pregnant, and able to provide informed consent in English. Data collected included demographics, measurements of accuracy of understanding including both gist accuracy (general understanding) and verbatim accuracy (numeric quantification), and preferences for risk communication formats including icon arrays, pie charts, bar graphs, and text. Descriptive analyses of the proportion of correctly answered questions were calculated. Results: A total of 247 participants completed ≥1 item on accuracy and risk communication preferences, and 230 provided complete responses. Gist (general) understanding was accurate between 74% and 89% of the time for most graphical formats. Verbatim understanding (exact numeric quantification) was approximately 90% accurate for most formats. Respondents preferred that figures be used over circles to display risk in icon arrays, both for themselves and for infants, although figures generated more worry. However, participants substantially preferred pie charts over bar graphs (59%-70% vs 19%-25%). Respondents preferred risk to be expressed with a lower denominator of 200 rather than a higher denominator of 1000 (79% vs 13%, although the lower denominator generated more worry), and in terms of chance of survival rather than chance of death (50% vs 33%). Conclusion: In a survey of pregnant and recently pregnant people, most respondents preferred pie charts over other graph formats, and lower rather than higher denominators in text. Presentations of survival rather than death estimates were also preferred. Approximately 75% to 90% of respondents accurately understood risk presented with visual and written communication. For the remaining participants, for whom accurate understanding was challenging, new strategies need to be developed.

Pregnant women's informational needs prior to decisions about prenatal diagnosis for chromosomal anomalies—A Q methodological study

Identifying Strategies to Improve Shared Decision Making for Pregnant Patients' Decisions about Prenatal Genetic Screens and Diagnostic Tests

Non‐invasive prenatal screening: Testing motivations and decision making in the low‐risk population

Preferences and Satisfaction of Pregnant Women

Women's preferences for genetic screening in routine care: A qualitative study

Decision-making process about prenatal genetic screening: how deeply do moms-to-be want to know from Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing?

Psychological Factors Influencing Choice of Prenatal Diagnosis in Chinese Multiparous Women with Advanced Maternal Age

Pregnant individuals' genetic literacy and decisional conflict about prenatal screening tests: A cross‐sectional study

Decision-making for congenital anomalies diagnosed during pregnancy: a narrative review

Pregnancy intentions in a group of remote-dwelling Australian Aboriginal women: a qualitative exploration of formation, expression and implications for clinical practice

Ethical considerations in prenatal genomic testing

Factors Contributing to Uptake of Stillbirth Evaluations: A Qualitative Analysis

Combining the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Early Pregnancy in Danish Antenatal Care-A Qualitative Descriptive Study

Understanding Knowledge, Perception, and Willingness of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Aneuploidy: a Survey among Chinese High-Risk Pregnant Women

Motivations for Undertaking DNA Sequencing-Based Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Aneuploidy: A Qualitative Study with Early Adopter Patients in Hong Kong

Understanding and preferences regarding risk communication during pregnancy: a survey to facilitate provider communication with patients

The role of patient-reported experiences in disclosing genetic prenatal testing: Findings from a large-scale survey on pregnant women

Information seeking behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs about pregnancy-related nutrition and supplementation: A qualitative study among US women

Willingness to pay for expanded non‐invasive prenatal screening – An online discrete choice experiment from the perspective of women living in Western Australia

Perspectives of pregnant women on broadening the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing from screening for foetal aneuploidies to prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes: A qualitative study

Informational needs related to aspirin prophylactic therapy amongst pregnant women at risk of preeclampsia - A qualitative study