Abstract:The dynamics simulation of multibody systems (MBS) using spatial velocities (non-holonomic velocities) requires time integration of the dynamics equations together with the kinematic reconstruction equations (relating time derivatives of configuration variables to rigid body velocities). The latter are specific to the geometry of the rigid body motion underlying a particular formulation, and thus to the used configuration space (c-space). The proper c-space of a rigid body is the Lie group SE(3), and the geometry is that of the screw motions. The rigid bodies within a MBS are further subjected to geometric constraints, often due to lower kinematic pairs that define SE(3) subgroups. Traditionally, however, in MBS dynamics the translations and rotations are parameterized independently, which implies the use of the direct product group $SO\left( 3\right) \times {\Bbb R}^{3}$ as rigid body c-space, although this does not account for rigid body motions. Hence, its appropriateness was recently put into perspective. In this paper the significance of the c-space for the constraint satisfaction in numerical time stepping schemes is analyzed for holonomicaly constrained MBS modeled with the 'absolute coordinate' approach, i.e. using the Newton-Euler equations for the individual bodies subjected to geometric constraints. It is shown that the geometric constraints a body is subjected to are exactly satisfied if they constrain the motion to a subgroup of its c-space. Since only the $SE\left( 3\right) $ subgroups have a practical significance it is regarded as the appropriate c-space for the constrained rigid body. Consequently the constraints imposed by lower pair joints are exactly satisfied if the joint connects a body to the ground. For a general MBS, where the motions are not constrained to a subgroup, the SE(3) and $SO\left( 3\right) \times {\Bbb R}^{3}$ yield the same order of accuracy.

Numerical Approaches for Constrained and Unconstrained, Static Optimization on the Special Euclidean Group SE(3)

A tutorial on $\mathbf{SE}(3)$ transformation parameterizations and on-manifold optimization

Control and maintenance of fully-constrained and underconstrained rigid body motion on Lie groups and their tangent bundles

Numerical methods of closed-loop multibody systems with singular configurations based on the geometrical structure of constraints

Optimal Attitude Control of a Rigid Body Using Geometrically Exact Computations on SO(3)

The significance of the configuration space Lie group for the constraint satisfaction in numerical time integration of multibody systems

The SO(3) and SE(3) Lie Algebras of Rigid Body Rotations and Motions and their Application to Discrete Integration, Gradient Descent Optimization, and State Estimation

A Riemannian optimization method on the indefinite Stiefel manifold

Review study of using Euler angles and Euler parameters in multibody modeling of spatial holonomic and non-holonomic systems

Dynamical systems with internal degrees of freedom in non-Euclidean spaces

Subspace dynamic simulation using rotation-strain coordinates

Optimality conditions for the nonlinear programming problems on Riemannian manifolds

Convex geometric motion planning of multi-body systems on lie groups via variational integrators and sparse moment relaxation

Constrained Geometric Attitude Control on SO(3)

Instantaneous GNSS Ambiguity Resolution and Attitude Determination via Riemannian Manifold Optimization

Vector Transport Free Riemannian LBFGS for Optimization on Symmetric Positive Definite Matrix Manifolds

Convex Geometric Motion Planning on Lie Groups via Moment Relaxation

Is there an optimal choice of configuration space for Lie group integration schemes applied to constrained MBS?

Non-Euclidean Motion Planning with Graphs of Geodesically-Convex Sets

Optimal control of robotic systems and biased Riemannian splines

Constrained Trajectory Optimization on Matrix Lie Groups via Lie-Algebraic Differential Dynamic Programming