Impact of numerical relativity information on effective-one-body waveform models

Alessandro Nagar,Gunnar Riemenschneider,Geraint Pratten
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.96.084045
IF: 5.407
2017-10-23
Physical Review D
Abstract:We present a comprehensive comparison of the spin-aligned effective-one-body (EOB) waveform model of Nagar et al. [Phys. Rev. D 93, 044046 (2016)PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.93.044046], informed using 39 numerical-relativity (NR) data sets, against a set of 149 ℓ=m=2 NR waveforms freely available through the Simulating Extreme Spacetimes (SXS) catalog. We find that, without further calibration, these EOBNR waveforms have unfaithfulness—at design Advanced-LIGO sensitivity and evaluated with total mass M varying as 10M⊙≤M≤200M⊙—always below 1% against all NR waveforms except for three outliers, that still never exceed the 3% level; with a minimal retuning of the (effective) next-to-next-to-next-to-leading-order spin-orbit coupling parameter for the non-equal-mass and non-equal-spin sector, that only needs three more NR waveforms, one is left with another two (though different) outliers, with maximal unfaithfulness of up to only 2% for a total mass of 200M⊙. We show this is the effect of slight inaccuracies in the phenomenological description of the postmerger waveform of Del Pozzo and Nagar [Phys. Rev. D 95, 124034 (2017)PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.95.124034] that was constructed by interpolating over only 40 NR simulations. We argue that this can be easily fixed by using either an alternative ringdown description (e.g., the superposition of quasi-normal-modes) or an improved version of the phenomenological representation. By analyzing a NR waveform with a mass ratio 8 and dimensionless spins +0.85 obtained with the bam code, we conclude that the model would benefit from NR simulations specifically targeted at improving the postmerger-ringdown phenomenological fits for mass ratios ≳8 and spins ≳0.8. We finally show that some of the longest SXS q=7 waveforms suffer from systematic uncertainties in the postmerger-ringdown part that are interpreted as due to unphysical drifts of the center of mass: thus some care should be applied when these waveforms are used for informing analytical models.
astronomy & astrophysics,physics, particles & fields
What problem does this paper attempt to address?