Abstract:Forest restoration is a vital nature-based solution for mitigating climate change and land degradation. To ensure restoration effectiveness, the costs and benefits of alternative restoration strategies (i.e., active restoration vs. natural regeneration) need to be evaluated. Existing studies generally focus on maximum restoration potential, neglecting the recovery potential achievable through natural regeneration processes, leading to incomplete understanding of the true benefits and doubts about the necessity of active restoration. In this study, we introduce a multi-stage framework incorporating both restoration and regeneration potential into prioritized planning for ecosystem restoration. We used the vegetated landscape of Hong Kong (covering 728 km2) as our study system due to its comprehensive fine-resolution data and unique history of vegetation recovery, making it an ideal candidate to demonstrate the importance of this concept and inspire further research. We analyzed vegetation recovery status (i.e., recovering, degrading, and stable) over the past decade based on the canopy height data derived from multi-temporal airborne LiDAR. We assessed natural regeneration potential and maximum restoration potential separately, producing spatially-explicit predictions. Our results show that 44.9% of Hong Kong's vegetated area has showed evidence of recovery, but remaining gains through natural regeneration are limited, constituting around 4% of what could be attained through active restoration. We further estimated restoration priority by maximizing the restoration gain. When prioritizing 5% of degraded areas, the increment in canopy height could be up to 10.9%. Collectively, our findings highlight the importance of integrating both restoration and regeneration potential into restoration planning. The proposed framework can aid policymakers and land managers in optimizing forest restoration options and promoting the protection and recovery of fragile ecosystems.

Quantifying forest degradation requires a long-term, landscape-scale approach

Congruent Long‐Term Declines in Carbon and Biodiversity Are a Signature of Forest Degradation

Long-term forest degradation surpasses deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon

Time and space catch up with restoration programs that ignore ecosystem service trade-offs

Quantifying the Recarbonization of Post-Agricultural Landscapes

The past and future of modeling forest dynamics: from growth and yield curves to forest landscape models

Accounting for forest condition in Europe based on an international statistical standard

Rethinking forest monitoring for more meaningful global forest landscape change assessments

A unifying modelling of multiple land degradation pathways in Europe

Quantifying the impact of management on the three-dimensional structure of boreal forests

Mapping protection effects and gaps of forest dynamics in Europe 2012 to 2018

Conceptualizing Different Forest Degradation Drivers with Special Reference to India

Integrating carbon sequestration and biodiversity impacts in forested ecosystems: Concepts, cases, and policies

Integrating both restoration and regeneration potentials into real-world forest restoration planning: A case study of Hong Kong

Developing landscape-scale forest restoration targets that embrace spatial pattern

One to rule them all? Assessing the performance of sustainable forest management indicators against multitaxonomic data for biodiversity conservation

Degradation debts accounting: A holistic approach towards land degradation neutrality COMMENT

Quantifying the impact of key factors on the carbon mitigation potential of managed temperate forests

Detection of Typical Forest Degradation Patterns: Characteristics and Drivers of Forest Degradation in Northeast China

Forest Landscape Restoration Legislation and Policy: A Canadian Perspective

Remote sensing of peatland degradation in temperate and boreal climate zones – A review of the potentials, gaps, and challenges