Abstract:The coordinated motion by multiple swimmers is a fundamental component in fish schooling. The flow field induced by the motion of each self-propelled swimmer implies non-linear hydrodynamic interactions among the members of a group. How do swimmers compensate for such hydrodynamic interactions in coordinated patterns? We provide an answer to this riddle though simulations of two, self-propelled, fish-like bodies that employ a learning algorithm to synchronise their swimming patterns. We distinguish between learned motion patterns and the commonly used a-priori specified movements, that are imposed on the swimmers without feedback from their hydrodynamic interactions. First, we demonstrate that two rigid bodies executing pre-specified motions, with an alternating leader and follower, can result in substantial drag-reduction and intermittent thrust generation. In turn, we study two self-propelled swimmers arranged in a leader-follower configuration, with a-priori specified body-deformations. These two self-propelled swimmers do not sustain their tandem configuration. The follower experiences either an increase or decrease in swimming speed, depending on the initial conditions, while the swimming of the leader remains largely unaffected. This indicates that a-priori specified patterns are not sufficient to sustain synchronised swimming. We then examine a tandem of swimmers where the leader has a steady gait and the follower learns to synchronize its motion, to overcome the forces induced by the leader's vortex wake. The follower employs reinforcement learning to adapt its swimming-kinematics so as to minimize its lateral deviations from the leader's path. Swimming in such a sustained synchronised tandem yields up to [Formula: see text] reduction in energy expenditure for the follower, in addition to a [Formula: see text] increase in its swimming-efficiency. The present results show that two self-propelled swimmers can be synchronised by adapting their motion patterns to compensate for flow-structure interactions. Moreover, swimmers can exploit the vortical structures of their flow field so that synchronised swimming is energetically beneficial.

Self-learning how to swim at low Reynolds number

Navigating micro- and nano-motors/swimmers with machine learning: Challenges and future directions

Learning to swim efficiently in a nonuniform flow field

Learning to swim in potential flow

Autonomous navigation of smart microswimmers in non-uniform flow fields

Learning swimming via deep reinforcement learning

Adaptive locomotion of artificial microswimmers

Active particles using reinforcement learning to navigate in complex motility landscapes

Synchronisation through learning for two self-propelled swimmers

Steering undulatory micro-swimmers in a fluid flow through reinforcement learning

Deep-reinforcement-learning-based self-organization of freely undulatory swimmers

A Low Reynolds Predator

A numerical study of fish adaption behaviors in complex environments with a deep reinforcement learning and immersed boundary–lattice Boltzmann method

Guided Deep Reinforcement Learning for Articulated Swimming Robots

Deep reinforcement learning for tracking a moving target in jellyfish-like swimming

A two-dimensional model of low-Reynolds number swimming beneath a free surface

Robot motor learning shows emergence of frequency-modulated, robust swimming with an invariant Strouhal-number

Reciprocal microswimming in fluctuating and confined environments

Emergence of odd elasticity in a microswimmer using deep reinforcement learning

Efficient collective swimming by harnessing vortices through deep reinforcement learning

A Swimming Rheometer: Self-propulsion of a freely-suspended swimmer enabled by viscoelastic normal stresses