Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment reveals an incremental association between natural diversity and mental wellbeing

Ryan Hammoud,Stefania Tognin,Michael Smythe,Johanna Gibbons,Neil Davidson,Ioannis Bakolis,Andrea Mechelli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55940-7
IF: 4.6
2024-04-17
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Using smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment, this study investigated an association between natural diversity on mental wellbeing. A sample of 1,998 participants completed 41,448 assessments between April 2018 and September 2023. Environments which included a larger range of natural features, such as trees, plants and birdlife (high natural diversity) were associated with greater mental wellbeing than environments including a smaller range of natural features (low natural diversity). There was evidence of a mediating effect of natural diversity on the association between natural environments and mental wellbeing. These results highlight the importance of policies and practices that support richness of biodiversity for public mental health.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to explore the impact of natural diversity on mental health, particularly the changes in psychological well-being when people interact with natural environments in their daily lives. The study uses the Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) method via smartphones to collect data from a large number of participants at different time points, reducing recall bias and capturing the dynamic process of psychological well-being as it changes over time and environment. Specifically, the study attempts to answer the following questions: 1. Is momentary contact with specific natural features (such as birds, trees, plants, and water bodies) associated with higher psychological well-being? Does this association persist over time? 2. Is there an incremental relationship between the number of natural features (i.e., natural diversity) and psychological well-being, meaning that environments with high natural diversity bring greater mental health benefits than those with low natural diversity? Does this association persist over time? 3. To what extent does the number of natural features encountered in natural environments mediate the relationship between natural environments and psychological well-being? Research hypotheses: 1. Seeing or hearing birds, trees, plants, and water bodies will be associated with higher immediate psychological well-being, and this effect will persist after the contact. 2. Increasing the number of different natural features that individuals can see or hear will be positively associated with higher immediate psychological well-being, and this association will persist over time. 3. The number of different natural features that individuals can see or hear will have a significant mediating effect on immediate psychological well-being when in natural environments.