Does on‐site computed tomography matter? A cross‐sectional study of stroke patients' door‐to‐scan‐time in rural hospitals

Nicholas Arnold,Kathryn Gough,Anthony Patsalou,Brendan Carrigan,William MacAskill
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.13140
2024-05-22
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Abstract:Purpose Many rural Australian hospitals lack on‐site computed tomography (CT). These hospitals often refer patients to local off‐site private radiology clinics or to central hospitals, challenging the achievement of time‐sensitive scans. For stroke patients, timely access to CT affects treatment options. This study questions whether on‐site CT matters in rural hospitals by investigating stroke patients' door‐to‐scan‐time (DTST) and CT scan sequence referrals. Method A retrospective chart audit was completed across four rural hospitals; two with on‐site CT and two without. Adult emergency stroke presentations were randomly sampled. Comparisons between on‐site and off‐site CT hospitals were made for DTST and CT sequence referrals using Mann–Whitney U‐tests and Fisher's exact tests. Results A total of 120 charts were audited (on‐site CT, n = 60; off‐site CT, n = 60). DTST was longer for off‐site vs. on‐site CT hospitals (median = 4.30 h vs. median = 0.70 h; U = 338, p
nursing,public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?