Levels of analysis, regnant causes of behavior and well-being: The role of psychological needs

Edward L Deci, Richard M Ryan

2011-02-28

Abstract:Within both basic philosophy of science and theoretical biology the idea that scientific disciplines can be organized in some type of hierarchy reflecting micro-to-macro levels of analysis has been widely discussed (eg, Corbi & Prades, 2000; Kauffman, 2000). Yet psychologists have often eschewed philosophical schemes as largely irrelevant to their investigation of human behavior. Sheldon, Cheng, and Hilpert’s (this issue) systematic presentation of these general ideas appropriately brings attention to the issue, which impacts all attempts at scientific explanation within our field. As would be expectable, their focus was primarily on what they put as the top three levels—personality, social relations, and culture—which are the primary levels where Sheldon’s own research has resided, but clearly many of their considerations apply across the levels Seldon et al. have differentiated, from micro-to-molar systems. It is …