Internal Drainage: An Interim Alternative to External Biliary Fistula in the Management of Postcholecystectomy Bile Duct Injury

Ibrarullah, Mohammad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-024-04171-1

2024-10-13

Indian Journal of Surgery

Abstract:Prolonged external biliary fistula, prior to hepaticojejunostomy in patients with bile duct injury, has many disadvantages. It can be overcome by ensuring internal drainage of bile. In a retrospective analysis, we assessed the feasibility of internal or interno-external drainage of the transected bile duct as alternative to external biliary fistula. All patients with transected bile duct requiring laparotomy for uncontrolled bile leak were included in the study. At laparotomy, an attempt was made to identify the proximal and the distal transected ends of the bile duct. A 12-f T-tube was placed into both the transected ends of the bile duct for E2 injury. In case of E4 or E5 injury, an additional plastic tube of 6–8 f size was placed into the second opening proximally. The distal end of the tube was either tucked into the bile duct or drained out as tube hepaticostomy. After ensuring free flow of contrast into duodenum and no extravasation, the subhepatic drain was removed and the T-tube was clamped. The patient was allowed complete resumption of normal activities in the interim period. The study included 13 patients—six E2, two E3, four E4, and one E5 injury. Complete internal drainage was possible in eight, interno-external drainage in two, and external drainage only in three patients. All patients recovered well and underwent hepaticojejunostomy after a median waiting period of 4 months (3–24 months). Interim restoration of normal bile flow with its proposed advantages is feasible in patients with bile duct injury awaiting hepaticojejunostomy.

surgery