Incorporation of the lepidic component as an additional pathological T descriptor for non-small cell lung cancer: Data from 3335 cases of lung adenocarcinoma

Shenghao Huang,Mengmeng Zhao,Shenghui Li,Tao Chen,Yifan Zhong,Jiajun Deng,Long Xu,Junqi Wu,Xiaofeng Xie,Chunyan Wu,Likun Hou,Yunlang She,Hui Zheng,Chang Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107472
IF: 6.081
2024-01-28
Lung Cancer
Abstract:Objectives The Lepidic Component (LP) identifies a subgroup with an excellent prognosis for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Our research aimed to propose an improved pathological T (pT) stage for LUAD based on LP. Materials and methods Totally, 3335 surgical patients with pathological stage I LUAD were incorporated. Factors affecting survival were investigated by analyzing recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses. Subgroup analysis based on Lepidic Ratio (LR) was further evaluated. The net benefit from the modified pT category (pTm) was assessed using the Area Under the time-dependent Receiver Operating Curve (AUC), Harrell's Concordance Index (C-index), Reclassification Improvement (NRI), and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI). Results The presence of LP (LP+) was identified in 1425 (42.7 %) patients, indicating a significantly better RFS ( P < 0.001) and OS ( P < 0.001) than those without LP, and similar results were reproduced in pT1a-pT2a subcategory ( P < 0.050 for all). Multivariable Cox analysis revealed LP+ as an independent prognostic factor for both RFS (HR, 0.622; P < 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.710; P = 0.019). However, lepidic ratio (LR) was not independently associated with both RFS and OS for LP+ patients. The 5-year RFS and OS rates between T1a (LP−) and T1b (LP+), T1b (LP−) and T1c (LP+), and T1b (LP−) and T2a (LP+) were comparable ( P > 0.050 for all). After modification, compared with current 8th edition pT stage system (pT8), pTm independently predicted RFS and OS, and AUCs, c-index, NRI, and IDI analysis all demonstrated pTm holds better discrimination performances than pT8 for LUAD prognosis. Conclusion LP can be an additional down-staged T descriptor for pathological stage I LUAD and improve the survival predictive performance of reclassification.
oncology,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?