The aging gastrointestinal tract: Epidemiology and clinical significance of disorders of gut‐brain interaction in the older general population

Ami D. Sperber,Tamar Freud,Olafur S. Palsson,Shrikant I. Bangdiwala,Magnus Simren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18103
IF: 9.524
2024-06-05
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Abstract:Individuals 65+ years have lower rates of DGBI including functional constipation but excluding faecal incontinence. With increasing age there are incremental reductions in the endorsement and frequency of pain symptoms. Despite this, the absolute rate of meeting diagnostic criteria for any of 22 DGBI (31.9%) is high and clinically relevant. Summary Background Most previous reports on the prevalence of disorders of gut‐brain interaction (DGBI) show higher rates in younger individuals. Exceptions are faecal incontinence and functional constipation. Aim To compare prevalence rates for 22 DGBI and 24 primary symptoms, by age, using the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology (RFGES) study dataset. Methods The RFGES dataset enables diagnosis of 22 DGBI among 54,127 participants (≥18 years) in 26 countries. Older age was defined as ≥65 years. We assessed differences between age groups by sex, geographic region, somatisation, abnormal anxiety and depression scores, quality of life (QoL), individual gastrointestinal symptoms and disease severity for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Results Rates for any DGBI were 41.9% and 31.9% in the <65 and ≥65 age groups, respectively. For all Rome IV diagnoses except faecal incontinence, rates were higher in the younger group. The older group had lower scores for any DGBI by geographic region, non‐gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, abnormal anxiety and depression scores, and IBS severity, and better scores for QoL. The mean number of endorsed symptoms and their frequency were higher in the younger group. Conclusions In this large general population study, the prevalence and impact of DGBI, apart from faecal incontinence, were higher in the younger group. Despite this, DGBI rates are still high in absolute terms in the ≥65 age group and necessitate clinical awareness and, perhaps, an age‐specific treatment approach.
pharmacology & pharmacy,gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?