Staging Liver Fibrosis: Comparison of Native T1 Mapping, T2 Mapping, and T1ρ: an Experimental Study in Rats with Bile Duct Ligation and Carbon Tetrachloride at 11.7 T MRI
Yimei Lu,Qianfeng Wang,Tingting Zhang,Jinning Li,Huanhuan Liu,Defan Yao,Liang Hou,Beiwu Tu,Dengbin Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27822
IF: 4.4
2021-01-01
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:BackgroundT1, T2, and T1ρ might be potential biomarkers for assessing liver fibrosis. However, few studies reported the value of them in different animal models.PurposeTo investigate and compare the performances of T1, T2, and T1ρ for noninvasively staging liver fibrosis in bile duct ligation (BDL) or carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) model.Study TypeProspective animal model.SubjectsLiver fibrosis was induced by BDL or injection of CCl4 in 120 rats.Field Strength/Sequence11.7 T, T1 mapping with 10 repetition times, T2 mapping with 32 echo times, and T1ρ with 10 spin‐lock times.AssessmentT1, T2, and T1ρ were measured and correlated with liver fibrosis stages, as well as the degree of inflammation, steatosis, iron deposition, and the expression of cytokeratin 19. The discriminative performance of T1, T2, and T1ρ for staging liver fibrosis was compared.Statistical TestsOne‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Spearman's correlation analysis, factorial design ANOVA, and receiver operating characteristic curves (P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant).ResultsT1, T2, and T1ρ (BDL: rho = 0.73, 0.85, 0.68; CCl4: rho = 0.80, 0.29, 0.61) were significantly correlated with liver fibrosis stages, while there was no significant difference in T2 among stage F0–F4 in the CCl4 model (P = 0.204). The area under the curves (AUCs) range of T1, T2, and T1ρ for predicting ≥F1, ≥F2, ≥F3, and F4 were 0.76–0.95, 0.89–0.98, and 0.80–0.94 in the CCl4 model. For the CCl4 model, the AUCs range of T1, T2, and T1ρ for predicting ≥F1, ≥F2, ≥F3, and F4 were 0.83–0.95, 0.61–0.74, and 0.73–0.89, respectively. T2 had significantly higher AUC in the BDL model than CCl4 model for diagnosing liver fibrosis.Data ConclusionThe most sensitive and accurate method for staging liver fibrosis appeared to be T1 in our animal models followed by T1ρ. T2 may not be suitable for evaluating liver fibrosis.Level of Evidence1Technical Efficacy Stage2