Abstract:Fish inhabit environments greatly varying in intensity of water velocity, and these flow regimes are generally believed to be of major evolutionary significance. To what extent does water flow drive repeatable and predictable phenotypic differentiation? Although many investigators have examined phenotypic variation across flow gradients in fishes, no clear consensus regarding the nature of water velocity's effects on phenotypic diversity has yet emerged. Here, I describe a generalized model that produces testable hypotheses of morphological and locomotor differentiation between flow regimes in fishes. The model combines biomechanical information (describing how fish morphology determines locomotor abilities) with ecological information (describing how locomotor performance influences fitness) to yield predictions of divergent natural selection and phenotypic differentiation between low-flow and high-flow environments. To test the model's predictions of phenotypic differentiation, I synthesized the existing literature and conducted a meta-analysis. Based on results gathered from 80 studies, providing 115 tests of predictions, the model produced some accurate results across both intraspecific and interspecific scales, as differences in body shape, caudal fin shape, and steady-swimming performance strongly matched predictions. These results suggest that water flow drives predictable phenotypic variation in disparate groups of fish based on a common, generalized model, and that microevolutionary processes might often scale up to generate broader, interspecific patterns. However, too few studies have examined differentiation in body stiffness, muscle architecture, or unsteady-swimming performance to draw clear conclusions for those traits. The analysis revealed that, at the intraspecific scale, both genetic divergence and phenotypic plasticity play important roles in phenotypic differentiation across flow regimes, but we do not yet know the relative importance of these two sources of phenotypic variation. Moreover, while major patterns within and between species were predictable, we have little direct evidence regarding the role of water flow in driving speciation or generating broad, macroevolutionary patterns, as too few studies have addressed these topics or conducted analyses within a phylogenetic framework. Thus, flow regime does indeed drive some predictable phenotypic outcomes, but many questions remain unanswered. This study establishes a general model for predicting phenotypic differentiation across flow regimes in fishes, and should help guide future studies in fruitful directions, thereby enhancing our understanding of the predictability of phenotypic variation in nature.

Limited predictability of body length in a fish population

Chaos is not rare in natural ecosystems

Life history strategies predict responses of lacustrine fish communities to eutrophication

Fluctuating landscapes and heavy tails in animal behavior

An individual-based predator-prey model for biological coevolution: Fluctuations, stability, and community structure

Predicting evolution with generalized models of divergent selection: a case study with poeciliid fish

Ploidy and the Predictability of Evolution in Fishers Geometric Model

Chaotic turnover of rare and abundant species in a strongly interacting model community

Genomic Evidence of Fisheries Induced Evolution in Eastern Baltic cod

Fluctuation scaling in Lévy-stable recruitment of marine fishes in randomly varying environments

Long-term analysis of phenotypically structured models

Predictability of phenotypic differentiation across flow regimes in fishes

Chaotic attractor in two-prey one-predator system originates from interplay of limit cycles

Noise leads to the perceived increase in evolutionary rates over short time scales

Chaotic behavior and controlling chaos in a fast-slow plankton-fish model

Stock Assessment and End-to-end Ecosystem Models Alter Dynamics of Fisheries Data

Broken symmetry of recruitment fluctuations in marine fishes: Lévy-stable laws and beyond

Embodied Computational Evolution: A Model for Investigating Randomness and the Evolution of Morphological Complexity

Complex dynamics may limit prediction in marine fisheries

Stability of a time-varying fishing model with delay

Collective Fluctuations in models of adaptation