A comparison of interactive computerized medical education software with a more traditional teaching format
C. S. Charles Lee,Gregory W. Rutecki,Frederick C. Whittier,Michelle R. Clarett,David Jarjoura
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10401339709539824
1997-01-01
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Abstract:Background: Computer‐assisted instruction in medicine appears to facilitate learning, but it has not been compared prospectively to more traditional teaching methods. Purpose: To compare the efficacy of computer‐assisted instruction to a more traditional format in medical students’ acquisition of clinical acid‐base problem‐solving skills. Methods: 2nd‐year medical students at Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine (N = 82) were randomized into 2 groups. Thirty‐seven received computer‐assisted instruction in acid‐base problem‐solving skills, and 45 were enrolled in a teacher‐supervised workshop. Preinstruction and postinstruction questionnaires, as well as a 25‐question test, were administered to all students. Results: Analysis of the preinstruction questionnaire demonstrated that the students’ preferred method of learning was the teacher supervised workshop (50%) followed by reading (39.5%). Fifty‐eight percent of the students did not use computers at all. Of the remaining 42%, average computer use was 5.9 days per month. At the end of the course, both groups felt equally prepared for the test. When asked, “If you had a choice to learn the material again, which would you choose: workshop, reading, or computer‐assisted instruction?”; 93% of the supervised‐workshop group chose the workshop, whereas 53% of the computer‐assisted instruction group chose computer‐assisted instruction (p < .001). No significant difference between the groups was demonstrated in performance on postinstruction recall questions. We did, however, find a significant difference favoring the workshop group in postinstruction problem‐solving skills (p = .04). Conclusions: Computer‐assisted instruction can be as effective as a teacher‐supervised workshop in transmitting clinical acid‐base knowledge skills to medical students. The students, however, do not appear inclined to rely solely on computer programs for learning and seem to benefit from teacher‐student interaction in learning problem‐solving skills.
education, scientific disciplines,health care sciences & services