Abstract:Ecological compensation is an effective measure to settle the conflicts between regional ecological protection and economic development; however, unequal patterns and impaired ecological benefits have been taking effects on the efficiency of eco-compensation worldwide. On the basis of the gross value of terrestrial ecosystems, the ecological profit-and-loss values have been identified, and the eco-compensation priority sequence has been calculated, while the ecological sensitivity has been evaluated. Four indicators of the spatial selection model have been conducted to reflect ecological benefits, ecological profit and loss, ecological sensitivity, and financial payment capacity, while the eco-compensation priorities have been classified by the K-means clustering. As for the results, Chun'an County with the highest priority and located in the low mountainous hills of the western Zhejiang area has been shown as the key compensated zone. The priority compensated zone has been concentrated in the mountainous hills of the western and southern Zhejiang and the headwaters of rivers in central Zhejiang. The secondary compensated zone has been distributed in the coastal islands of eastern Zhejiang. The potential compensated zone has been located in the northern plains and the central and southeastern areas of Zhejiang. It has been shown that the ecological benefits and the gross ecosystem product of various regions would have a direct impact on the evaluation results. A comprehensive index system would be needed to facilitate the allocation of funds to areas with important ecosystem services, ecological sensitivity, and high ecological benefits. The findings of the performed study could contribute to improving the spatial selection method of eco-compensation.

Correction: Xiao et al. An Assessment of the Rational Range of Eco-Compensation Standards: A Case Study in the Nujiang Prefecture, Southwestern China. Land 2022, 11, 1417

Erratum: Xuan Wei, et al. Assessing the Effects of Desertification Control Projects from the Farmers’ Perspective: A Case Study of Yanchi County, Northern China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 983

Correction: Huan et al. A Frugal Eco-Innovation Policy? Ecological Poverty Alleviation in Contemporary China from a Perspective of Eco-Civilization Progress. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4570

Corrections to "using Land Long Term Data Records to Map Land Cover Changes in China over 1981-2010"

Correction: Yang et al. A Study on the Spatio-Temporal Land-Use Changes and Ecological Response of the Dongting Lake Catchment. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 716

Erratum: Zhou, S., et al. Warming Effort and Energy Budget Difference of Various Human Land Use Intensity: Case Study of Beijing, China. Land 2020, 9, 280

Correction to: Spatial analysis of production-living-ecological functions and zoning method under symbiosis theory of Henan, China

Correction: Xu et al. The Effect of the National Specially Monitored Firms Program on Water-Polluting Firms' Green Total Factor Productivity. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8049

Correction: Cao et al. The Ecological Relationship of Groundwater–Soil–Vegetation in the Oasis–Desert Transition Zone of the Shiyang River Basin. Water 2021, 13, 1642

Corrigendum: Changes and net ecosystem productivity of terrestrial ecosystems and their influencing factors in China from 2000 to 2019

Erratum to: A justice and innovative way ahead of consumption-based emission accounting approach

Corrigendum to "The evaluation and optimization of the agricultural sustainable development based on a data-driven approach: A case from Northern Anhui" [Heliyon 10(12) June 2024, Article e32963]

Multiobjective Optimization for Eco-Compensation Space Selection based on Gross Ecosystem Product

Erratum: Kabeja, C., et al. The Impact of Reforestation Induced Land Cover Change (1990–2017) on Flood Peak Discharge Using HEC-HMS Hydrological Model and Satellite Observations: A Study in Two Mountain Basins, China. Water 2020, 12, 1347

Correction To: Bridging the Science-Practice Gaps in Nature-Based Solutions: A Riverfront Planning in China

Correction: Li et al. A Comparison of Various Bottom-Up Urban Energy Simulation Methods Using a Case Study in Hangzhou, China. Energies 2020, 13, 4781

Correction to: Urbanization Impact on Regional Climate and Extreme Weather: Current Understanding, Uncertainties, and Future Research Directions

Correction: Hou, X. Tourism Network Attention Variation of Chinese Cities under the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5131

Yang et al. A Study on the Spatio-Temporal Land-Use Changes and Ecological Response of the Dongting Lake Catchment. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 716

Correction: Liu Et Al. Analysis of Carbon Emissions Embodied in the Provincial Trade of China Based on an Input–Output Model and K-Means Algorithm. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9196

Corrigendum: Impact of climate change and rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantation expansion on reference evapotranspiration in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China