Habitation Altitude and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function: A Population-Based Study.

Congyi Zheng,Xin Wang,Haosu Tang,Zuo Chen,Linfeng Zhang,Su Wang,Yuting Kang,Ying Yang,Linlin Jiang,Gang Huang,Zengwu Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.120.018079

IF: 6.106

2021-01-21

Journal of the American Heart Association

Abstract:Background Although numerous studies have been published evaluating the positive or negative effects of altitude on cardiovascular disease, many of them are conflicting. Methods and Results Data come from 2 cross‐sectional surveys using a similar method in China; and a total of 34 215 residents, aged ≥35 years, were eligible and recruited in the study. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), according to the 2009 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines, was defined and evaluated. Altitude was divided into low (<1500 m), middle (1500–3500 m), and high (≥3500 m) level groups. Among the 34 215 participants (aged 55.87 years; men, 45.92%; altitude ranging from 3.1 ~ 4507 m), 15 099 (crude prevalence, 44.13%), 517 (crude prevalence, 1.51%), and 272 (crude prevalence, 0.79%) were diagnosed as having grades I, II, and LVDD, respectively. Compared with low‐level group, the odds ratios (ORs) (95% CIs) of LVDD for middle‐ and high‐level groups were 1.65 (1.49–1.82) and 1.89 (1.63–2.19), respectively ( P trend <0.001). The ORs (95% CI) were 1.43 (1.31–1.56) and 2.03 (1.67–2.47) per 500‐m increment for middle‐ and high‐level groups. There was a nonlinear relationship (upward‐sloping "W" shape) between altitude and the risk of LVDD, assessed by the restricted cubic spline. For each LVDD grade, ORs (95% CIs) of grade I LVDD for middle‐ and high‐level groups were 1.75 (1.59–1.92) and 1.95 (1.69–2.25), respectively; for grade II, ORs (95% CIs) for middle‐ and high‐level groups were 6.19 (3.67–10.42) and 5.27 (2.18–12.74), respectively. The stratified analyses indicated that LVDD was much more remarkably influenced by elevated altitude in men ( P interaction =0.0019). Conclusions Higher altitude is associated with increased risk of LVDD among people living over 1500 m, especially for men. Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms CVD cardiovascular disease LV left ventricular LVDD left ventricular diastolic dysfunction OR odds ratio Clinical Perspective What Is New? This is the first large‐scale, free‐living, population‐based study to report the association between habitation altitude and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. What Are the Clinical Implications? The current study found that elevated altitude was significantly associated with a higher risk of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction among people living in ≥1500‐m areas, which provided a reference that was necessary to consider the impact of habitation altitude in high‐risk individual screening; and for those living in middle or high elevation areas, modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factor intervention and control should be much stricter. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), an early sign of cardiac dysfunction, is a predictor of congestive heart failure, myocardial ischemia, and fatal cardiovascular events. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 Even in asymptomatic patients, grade I (impaired relaxation pattern) diastolic dysfunction was associated with a 5‐fold higher 3‐ to 5‐year mortality in comparison with subjects with normal diastolic function. 5 So, the exploration of LVDD and its risk factors will benefit the cardiovascular disease (CVD) early prevention, intervention, and treatment, especially for those who are asymptomatic. Altitude is the most basic hierarchical classification of geomorphology, and there are >140 million people living at high altitude (>2400 m) in the world. 6 Low air pressure (hypoxic conditions), 7 cold, 8 and large daily temperature variability 9 , 10 are the typical climate characteristics of plateau re -Abstract Truncated-

cardiac & cardiovascular systems