The taxonomic status of the lizardfishes Saurida elongata (Temminck and Schlegel 1846) and S. eso Jordan and Herre 1907 with comments on the validity of S. argyrophanes (Richardson 1846)

Furuhashi, Ryusei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-024-01004-9

2024-12-14

Ichthyological Research

Abstract:The lizardfish Saurida elongata (Temminck and Schlegel 1846) described from three specimens collected from Japan, has had a confused nomenclatural history and the name has long been misapplied. Re-examination of the type specimens in the Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, has shown that they comprise two distinct species, and two of the three specimens are recognised as lectotype and paralectotype, respectively. Based on these specimens and others examined here, S. elongata is redescribed. Saurida eso Jordan and Herre 1907, previously considered a synonym of S. elongata , is resurrected as a valid species, and also redescribed. Saurida wanieso Shindo and Yamada 1972 is now included as a synonym of S. elongata ; and Saurida microlepis Wu and Wang 1931 is included as a synonym of S. eso . The name Saurida japonica Jordan and Evermann 1902 (not Cobitis japonica Houttuyn 1782), previously unrecognised, is considered to be an available name, but because of its poor description is regarded as a nomen dubium . Consequently, even though predating S. eso , S. japonica of Jordan and Evermann is relegated as an uncertain synonym of S. eso . Saurida elongata has been included by some authors as a synonym of Saurida argyrophanes (Richardson 1846). The latter species, however, is based solely on a painting in the Reeves collection of Chinese fish drawings now in the Natural History Museum, London, and lacks important diagnostic features. As such, S. argyrophanes cannot be confidently referred to any known species of Saurida and is also regarded here as a nomen dubium .

zoology,marine & freshwater biology,fisheries