Abstract:We performed a meta-analysis of the cancer detection rates from 24 published reports in dense breasts for all contemporary and FDA-approved imaging modalities (DM, DBT, U/S, CEM, MBI, MRI) available for supplemental breast cancer screening. This information is critical to the 40% of women with BIRADS categorized dense breasts (C,D) receiving breast cancer screening. In the paper an analysis of the net lives saved using a benefit-to-risk comparison of the ionizing imaging modalities (DM, DBT and MBI) is also presented and the safety of each technique is described. Note that it is well accepted that carcinogenic risk associated with ionizing radiation doses of < 100 mSv are considered too small to be detected or altogether non-existant. Recently, with FDA's federal MQSA requirements changing to mandate notification of womens' dense-breast status (C,D), awareness has grown substantially about the dismal cancer detection performances of DM, DBT and U/S which degrades substantially with increasing breast density. Additionally, this May 2023, federal legislation was introduced in congress. The Find It Early Act (HR3086), should it become law in 2024, will require that healthcare payors cover costs for supplemental screening of women with dense breasts. Knowing and understanding the arsenal of the highest performing imaging modalities (based on cancer detection rates (CDR), Sensitivity, Specificity, NPV) is critically important for all patients and physicians caring for them. The volume of women qualifying for supplemental breast screening is expected to be managed by existing and growing numbers of all the best performing available technologies and approaches. Since the analysis is based on numerous others' clinical trials of CDRs evaluating the various modalities in millions of women, this comprehensive analysis presents a level playing field for comparison. The top-three high performing imaging modalities (CEM, MBI, MRI) should be used to increase the number of early-stage cancers found in order to substantially decrease mortality, decrease patient trauma, decrease procedures, and decrease costs per cancer detected, all at overall benefit to the patients, the hospitals, the payors and provide long-term benefits to society. Table. Summary of Relative Cancer Detection Rates (per 1,000 women) in Dense-Breast Supplemental Screening Results of multiple pairwise meta-analyses comparing various modalities (Digital Breast Tomosynthesis; Ultrasound; Contrast Enhanced Mammography; Molecular Breast Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging) to Digital Mammography. "X" represents the second supplemental screening modality compared to DM. "+X" means the combination of DM+X. Two normalizations are compared: "CDR Ratio model" and "Incremental CDR model." Table. Net Lives Saved by Ionizing Radiation Imaging Modalities per Age Decade Citation Format: Martin Tornai, James Hugg, Bradley Patt, Chin-Tu Chen, Eduardo Santos, Alaattin Erkanli, Samantha Morrison, Matthew Covington. Cancer Detection Rate Meta-Analysis Comparison of Contemporary Dense-Breast Supplemental Screening Modalities [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl) nr PO5-18-01.

Comparison of Mammography and Mammography with Supplemental Whole-Breast US Tomography for Cancer Detection in Patients with Dense Breasts

Can Combined Screening of Ultrasound and Elastography Improve Breast Cancer Identification Compared with MRI in Women with Dense Breasts-a Multicenter Prospective Study

Diagnostic Performance of Adjunctive Imaging Modalities Compared to Mammography Alone in Women with Non-Dense and Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of Efficacy for Mammography Versus Ultrasonography in Stages T1 and Tis Breast Cancer

Breast-specific gamma imaging or ultrasonography as adjunct imaging diagnostics in women with mammographically dense breasts

Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound and Handheld Ultrasound in Women with Dense Breasts

An Investigation of Tomosynthesis on the Diagnostic Efficacy of Spot Compression Mammography

Virtual clinical trial to compare cancer detection using combinations of 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D imaging

Abstract PO5-18-01: Cancer Detection Rate Meta-Analysis Comparison of Contemporary Dense-Breast Supplemental Screening Modalities

Breast Cancer Screening With Automated Breast US and Mammography vs Handheld US and Mammography in Women With Dense Breasts in a Real-World Clinical Setting

Performance of Supplemental Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: Findings From an Umbrella Review and Primary Studies Analysis

Full-field Digital Mammography for the Dense Breast Cancer in Women

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Synthesized Two-Dimensional Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography Alone or in Combination with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

The Added Value of Supplemental Breast Ultrasound Screening for Women With Dense Breasts: A Single Center Canadian Experience

Performance of Supplemental US Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Varying Breast Cancer Risk: Results from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium

Comparative Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Diagnosing and Treating Breast Cancer

Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis plus synthetic mammography versus full‐field digital mammography with or without tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Morphological and Distribution Pattern of Calcifications on Full Field Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Comparison of Diagnostic Abilities of the Two Modalities: A Retrospective Study

Integration of Handheld Ultrasound or Automated Breast Ultrasound among Women with Negative Mammographic Screening Findings: A Multi-center Population-based Study in China

Breast Digital Tomosynthesis versus Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Comparison of Diagnostic Application and Radiation Dose in a Screening Setting