Tumor regression grade combined with post‐therapy lymph node status: A novel independent prognostic factor for patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery in locally advanced gastroesophageal junction and gastric carcinoma

Hongyan Yin,Qian Yao,Yi Xie,Dongfeng Niu,Wenya Jiang,Huiying Cao,Xujiao Feng,Yanyan Li,Yilin Li,Xiaotian Zhang,Lin Shen,Yang Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6597
IF: 4.711
2023-09-26
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:Whether tumor regression grade (TRG) combined with ypN status could be a prognostic factor for gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and gastric cancer (GC) was unclear. In our study, we retrospectively analyzed 376 patients' data to elucidate the relationships between TRG combined with ypN status and prognosis. These patients were innovatively categorized into four groups: TRG0N0, TRG1‐3N0, TRG0‐1N+, and TRG2‐3N+. Then we evaluated the predictive value of TRG combined wiht ypN status. Our results suggest that TRG combined with ypN status is a novel independent predictor of both DFS and OS in resectable, locally advanced GEJ, and GC. The application of neoadjuvant immunotherapy significantly increased the TRG0N0 rate, which represented the best prognosis in our findings. Background Tumor regression grade (TRG) is a measure of histopathological response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Post‐therapy lymph node (ypN) metastasis was reported as a prognostic factor. However, the evaluation of the treatment effectiveness of NAT has not been well studied. Here, we explored whether TRG combined with ypN status could be a prognostic factor for gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and gastric cancer (GC). Besides, we aimed at making clear the association of different neoadjuvant regimens with different TRG and ypN status. Methods 376 patients with GEJ or GC accepting NAT in Peking University Cancer Hospital were retrospectively collected from January 1, 2003 to June 30, 2021. According to TRG and ypN status, patients were innovatively categorized into four groups: TRG0N0, TRG1‐3N0, TRG0‐1N+, and TRG2‐3N+. We applied Kaplan–Meier method and log‐rank test to testify the differences in disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among four groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the relationships between TRG combined with ypN status and prognosis. Results We observed significant survival differences among the four groups (p
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?