A Multi-Scale Modeling of Confined Fluid: from Nanopore to Unconventional Reservoir Simulation

Nicolas Sobecki,Shihao Wang,Didier Yu Ding,Carlos Nieto-Draghi,Yu-Shu Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107364
IF: 5.168
2020-10-01
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Abstract:<p>Tight oil and shale gas reservoirs have a significant part of their pore volume occupied by micro (below 2 nm) and mesopores (between 2 and 50 nm). This kind of environment creates strong interaction forces in the confined fluid with pore walls and then changes dramatically the fluid phase behavior. An important work has therefore to be done on thermodynamic modeling of the confined fluid and on developing upscaling methodology of the pore size distribution for large scale reservoir simulations. Firstly, the comparison between molecular simulation results and commonly used modified equation of state (EOS) in the literature highlighted the model of flash with capillary pressure and critical temperature and pressure shift as the best one to model confined fluid behavior. Then, fine grid matrix/fracture simulations have been built and performed for different pore size distributions. The study has shown that the pore size distribution has an important impact on reservoir production and this impact is highly dependent on the volume fraction of nanopores inside the matrix. Afterwards, coarse grid upscaling models have then been performed on the same synthetic case and compared to the reference fine grid results. The commonly used upscaling methodology of dual porosity model with average pore radius for the pore size distribution is unable to match the fine grid results. A new triple porosity model considering fracture, small pores and large pores with their own capillary pressure and EOS, together with MINC (Multiple Interacting Continua) approach, has shown very good agreement with the reference fine grid results. Finally a large scale stimulated reservoir volume with different pore size distribution inside the matrix has been built using the upscaling method developed here.</p>
energy & fuels,engineering, petroleum
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on fluid behavior and flow dynamics in shale gas and tight oil reservoirs. Specifically: 1. **Modeling the thermodynamic behavior of fluids in nanopores**: There are a large number of micropores (<2 nm) and mesopores (2 - 50 nm) in shale gas and tight oil reservoirs. These pores lead to strong interaction forces between the fluid and the pore walls, thus significantly changing the phase behavior of the fluid. The paper calibrates the modified Equation of State (EOS) with the results of molecular simulations to more accurately describe the thermodynamic behavior of fluids in nanopores. 2. **Multi - scale modeling and development of up - scaling methods**: Due to the complex pore structure of shale gas and tight oil reservoirs, multi - scale modeling from nanopores to unconventional reservoir simulations is a challenge. The paper studies the influence of different pore size distributions on reservoir production and develops a new triple - pore model (considering fractures, small pores and large pores as well as their respective capillary pressures and EOS), combined with the Multiple Interacting Continua (MINC) method, to improve the accuracy of large - scale reservoir simulations. 3. **Matrix - fracture exchange modeling**: Multi - stage hydraulic fracturing in shale gas and tight oil reservoirs has produced highly heterogeneous porous/fractured rocks, in which fluids flow between the low - permeability matrix (containing nanopores) and fractures. The paper explores how to accurately model this matrix - fracture exchange process in reservoir simulations, which is crucial for optimizing production predictions, especially Gas - Oil - Ratio (GOR) predictions. ### Specific problems and solutions - **Thermodynamic behavior of fluids in nanopores**: - **Method 1**: Flash with Capillary Pressure algorithm. Calculate the capillary pressure through the Young - Laplace equation and incorporate it into the flash calculation. - **Method 2**: Flash with Critical Point Shift algorithm. Adjust the critical temperature and critical pressure through the correlation verified by the results of molecular simulations to reflect the influence of pore size. - **Integrated method**: Use both of the above methods simultaneously, that is, adjust the critical point on the basis of considering the capillary pressure to obtain more accurate results. - **Multi - scale modeling and up - scaling methods**: - **Fine - grid simulation**: Construct and run fine - grid matrix/fracture simulations with different pore size distributions, and analyze the influence of pore size distributions on reservoir production. - **Coarse - grid up - scaling model**: Develop a new triple - pore model, consider fractures, small pores and large pores as well as their respective capillary pressures and EOS, combine with the MINC method, and compare with the fine - grid results to verify its effectiveness. - **Matrix - fracture exchange modeling**: - **Single - pore model**: Use a phase - behavior model including the capillary pressure effect for reservoir simulation, and study the production influence under different pore sizes. - **Multi - pore model**: Develop a new triple - pore model, consider different pore types and their interactions, and improve the accuracy of simulations. ### Summary Through detailed thermodynamic modeling and multi - scale simulations, this paper aims to solve the complex problems of fluid behavior and flow dynamics in shale gas and tight oil reservoirs, especially the fluid phase behavior in nanopores and the matrix - fracture exchange process. By introducing the methods of capillary pressure and critical point shift, as well as developing a new triple - pore model, the paper provides important theoretical and technical support for improving the accuracy of large - scale reservoir simulations.