Abstract:This paper reports on an international comparison of three organisations established to promote new business start–ups in the USA, UK and Canada. A ‘knowledge–based’ approach is adopted to examine how networks of would–be entrepreneurs interact with networks of experienced entrepreneurs and managers, venture capitalists, technical experts, consultants, IPR lawyers and other specialists. This interaction is promoted and mediated at the local level by the three organisations at the centre of the study: the Austin Technology Incubator (ATI), Texas; Connect, Edinburgh; and the Canadian Environmental Technology Advancement Corporation (CETAC–West) in Canada. These act as local network–nodes or ‘knowledge integrators’, as well as ‘incubating’ new ventures to increase the new business ‘birth rate’ in their respective regions. The comparison is based on interviews and secondary data that describe the initiation, development, operation and local impact of these organisations. Findings stress the importance of the regional context as a source of particular kinds of knowledge and expertise that may promote or inhibit new technology–based business start–ups. In particular: the scale, scope and quality of ideas and business proposals in local networks; the availability of relevant expertise and experience for ‘intelligent selection’ and for successful mentoring; the nature of rewards and incentives for all players; and the importance of local champions or figureheads, are all factors that help explain differences across the example regions. The paper combines a variety of conceptual approaches around the idea of regional knowledge networks which underpin ‘distributed innovation’. Heightened technological and market uncertainty for new technology–based firms places a premium on the ability of entrepreneurs to integrate specialist knowledge and utilise expertise from a variety of local sources. Despite differences in the scale, scope and effectiveness of their efforts we conclude that all three organisations are supporting ‘accelerated learning’ amongst entrepreneurs.

Intra- and interregional flows of business angel investment: mapping the winners and losers across UK regions and core urban economies

Capital shocks, the great recession, and UK regional divergence

Assessment of Business Angel Activity in Northern European Countries

Regional Productivity Differences, Skills and Inclusive Growth: Survey Findings

Mitigating local bias in equity crowdfunding: a financial ecology perspective

Regional and spatial issues in the financing of small and medium-sized enterprises and new ventures

Does Gender Matter? Women Business Angels and the Supply of Entrepreneurial Finance

High Value-Added Business Angels at post-investment stages: Key predictors

University venture capital in big data, regional and historical perspective: where and why has it arisen?

Knowledge Networks for New Technology-Based Firms: an International Comparison of Local Entrepreneurship Promotion

Are there inequality spillovers? Evidence through a modified inequality measure and European dynamics of inequality

Patient capital in entrepreneurial finance: a reassessment of the role of business angel investors

Spatial division of opportunity: local economic context, elite trajectories, and the widening participation industry

Does equity crowdfunding benefit ventures located in high unemployment regions?

New directions in regional innovation policy: a network model for generating entrepreneurship and economic development

Knowledge Flows and Industrial Clusters: Assessing the Sources of Competitive Advantage in Two English Regions

Regional Entrepreneurial Opportunities in the Biotech Industry: Exploring the Transition from Award-Winning Nascent Entrepreneurs to Real Start-Ups

The Rise of Venture Capital Centres in China: A Spatial and Network Analysis

Geography of knowledge collaboration and innovation in Schumpeterian firms

Cross-border real estate investment: a different animal? Comparative evidence from bilateral flow data

Innovation and regional development via the firm’s core competence: some recent evidence from North East England