Paediatric radiology training in the UK: a national trainee survey by the British Society of Paediatric Radiologists (BSPR)

M. Dupre,R. Spruce,E. Evans,R. Meshaka,S.C. Shelmerdine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.01.002
IF: 3.389
2024-01-21
Clinical Radiology
Abstract:AIM To survey current UK radiology trainee experiences and opinions regarding the quality of paediatric radiology training encountered in their core years, and assess their career ambitions with regards to paediatric radiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 22-question online survey, approved by the BSPR committee, was promoted over 12 months (1 February 2022 to 31 January 2023) across current radiology trainees and fellows via regional radiology training programme directors (TPDs), Junior Radiology Forum (JRF) trainee representatives, at BSPR Junior Forum webinar teaching sessions, and via social media/word of mouth. RESULTS Eighty-three UK survey responses were received from 17/19 (89%) training schemes. Sixty of the 83 (72%) had taken or were due to take a 2–4 month core paediatric radiology placement partly at tertiary centres (66/83, 80%), with 67/83 (81%) receiving dedicated didactic teaching. Only 26/83 (31%) reported fulfilling core curriculum competencies and 32/83 (39%) reported not receiving enough paediatric radiology training. Almost a quarter (18/83, 22%) reported <2 months of paediatric radiology rotation during core training and 12% (10/83) across six training schemes, reported no dedicated paediatric teaching sessions. Respondents who left negative comments around their experience were more likely to reject paediatric radiology as a future career option ( p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS Only 31% of UK radiology trainees reported having enough paediatric radiology training to achieve core competencies. Standardised training, teaching, and increased on-call support could improve confidence in dealing with emergency cases and encourage interest in paediatric radiology beyond junior years.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?