Hot Compression Mechanism and Comparative Study on Constitutive Models of Mo–3 vol%Al2O3 Alloys

Liying Yao,Yimin Gao,Liujie Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00831-5
IF: 3.451
2020-08-03
Metals and Materials International
Abstract:<span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec1"><p class="a-plus-plus">The hot compression tests for Mo–3 vol.%Al<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">3</sub> alloys were conducted on a Gleeble-1500D thermo-mechanical simulator in the temperatures range of 1000–1300 °C and strain rates range of 0.005–1 s<sup class="a-plus-plus">−1</sup>. The hot deformation behavior, mechanism associated with microstructure evolution of Mo–3 vol.%Al<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">3</sub> alloys was investigated by electron backscattering diffraction analysis. Three types of stress–strain curves were analyzed by quantifying the work hardening rate. The deformation mechanism at 1000–1300 °C mainly included the plastic deformation of Mo–3 vol.%Al<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">3</sub> alloy, as well as the dynamic recovery and recrystallization of Mo matrix. The modified Arrhenius, Modified Johnson–Cook and modified Zerilli–Armstrong constitutive equations were established and evaluated by the correlation coefficient (R<sub class="a-plus-plus">c</sub>) and average absolute relative error (<span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq1"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x">\({\bar{\text{e}}}\)</span></span>). The flow stress of Mo–3 vol.%Al<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">3</sub> alloys could be well predicted by those three constitutive models, but modified Arrhenius constitutive model had a higher predicated accuracy.</p></span><span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec2 outputmedium-online"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Graphic </h3><p class="a-plus-plus">The hot deformation behavior, mechanism associated with microstructure evolution of Mo–3 vol.% Al<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">3</sub> alloys has been investigated by EBSD analysis. Three types of stress–strain curves were analyzed by quantifying the work hardening rate. The deformation mechanism at 1000–1300 °C mainly included the plastic deformation of Mo–3 vol.% Al<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">3</sub> alloy, as well as the dynamic recovery and recrystallization of Mo matrix. Moreover, modified Arrhenius constitutive model had a higher predicated accuracy for Mo–3 vol.% Al<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">3</sub> alloys than modified JC and modified ZA constitutive models.</p></span>
materials science, multidisciplinary,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?