Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict

Robert J. Bookmiller
1997-04-01
Abstract:Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, by Norman G. Finkelstein. London and New York: Verso, 1995. 171 pages. Notes to p. 237. Index to p. 243. $18.95. Reviewed by Robert J. Bookmiller In this work, Norman Finkelstein attacks traditional, official and revisionist accounts of the Israel-Palestine conflict and challenges myths and mythmakers across the political spectrum. His stated purpose "is to use, as the foil of my critique, an influential piece, or standard body of scholarship...to point up the systematic bias of, as well as to make a modest contribution to, the extant literature"(p. 2). He succeeds in both goals. The "foils" or works utilized by Finkelstein are well known to those engaged in Middle East studies. They include: Joan Peters' From Time Immemorial; Benny Morris' The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949; Anita Shapira's Land and Power: The Zionist Resort to Force, 1881-1948;' and the vast body of writings produced by former Israeli foreign minister Abba Eban. While the author does an admirable job of integrating these works into the larger discussion of image and reality, readers will be at a disadvantage if they are not familiar with the original studies. Finkelstein destroys Peters' already discredited thesis that the Palestinians residing in pre-state Israel were not indigenous but recent immigrants who came because of economic opportunities created by the Zionists. Through carefully documented and meticulously crafted arguments, he exposes Peters' book as "among the most spectacular frauds ever published on the Arab-Israeli conflict" (p. 22). What makes this essay salient is that it was originally penned in 1984 when Peters' book was reaping huge accolades-including the National Jewish Book Award. At that time, there were no articles critical of Peters' scholarship, and Finkelstein notes that it was difficult to publish any work critical of Peters' book in 1984. In a totally separate vein, the author also takes issue with Morris' revisionist view that the Palestinian refugee problem was born of war and not by some grand Zionist design. Morris argues that the Zionists did not expel the Palestinians with premeditation, as the Arabs allege, nor did the Palestinians leave at the urging of the Arab states, as Israel maintains. Finkelstein disputes Morris' middle-ground thesis and instead holds that there was much premeditation on the part of Zionist leaders, in order to create an exclusively Jewish state. Finkelstein also calls into account Eban's official version of Israeli history, in particular Tel Aviv's actions prior to the 1967 and 1973 ArabIsraeli wars. …
Sociology,Political Science,History
What problem does this paper attempt to address?