Factors Associated with the Awareness of and Willingness to Use HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men, Baltimore, MD, 2017–2019
Hope King,Nicole Thornton,Kimberly N Evans,Yomi Tadfor,Danielle German,Colin Flynn,Jacky Jennings,Errol L Fields,King, Hope
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-01954-w
2024-03-05
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Abstract:Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective tool in protecting persons from acquiring HIV infection through sex or injection drug use. However, awareness and willingness to use PrEP among Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (BMSM) remain suboptimal compared to White MSM (WMSM) in the United States. Our aims were to (1) assess the factors associated with PrEP awareness and willingness to use PrEP among MSM and (2) compare the PrEP perceptions among BMSM versus non-Black MSM. Data were drawn from two cross-sectional behavioral surveys in Baltimore, MD: Behavioral Surveillance Research (BESURE) conducted in 2017, and Safe Spaces 4 Sexual Health (SS4SH), conducted in 2018 and 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the study population. We used Poisson regression models to identify variables associated with awareness of PrEP and willingness to use PrEP. PrEP perceptions were assessed via 13 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Finally, we conducted a post-hoc exploratory bivariate analysis of the relationship between PrEP perception and willingness to use PrEP, stratified by race/ethnicity. A total of 261 MSM participated in this study. Many of the participants were aware of PrEP (75.1%). Factors associated with greater PrEP awareness included having greater than a high school education (aRR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04, 1.43); and earning more than $25,000 annually (aRR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08, 1.42). Participants who had received money in exchange for sex one or more times were less likely to be aware of PrEP (aRR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36, 0.95). More than half of the participants were willing to use PrEP (55.3%). In bivariate and multivariable analyses, demographic or behavioral characteristics were not significantly associated with willingness to use PrEP. Higher agreement with the following statements was associated with lower willingness to use PrEP: "Having to take a pill every day is difficult" (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82–0.97) and, "I am concerned about the side effects of PrEP" (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82–0.96), and "PrEP is for people who have riskier sex lives than I do" (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78–0.95). Conversely, higher willingness to use PrEP was associated with comfortable having sex without a condom (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02–1.21), less anxious about sex (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02–1.24), and my friends think that I should take PrEP (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07–1.32). We found BMSM compared to non-Black MSM had higher mean scores related to taking a daily pill ( p = 0.041), concerns about side effects ( p = 0.012), concerns about people thinking they had HIV ( p = 0.001), concerns about the financial costs of PrEP ( p = 0.038) and caution when dealing with healthcare organizations/medical mistrust ( p = 0.019). Perceptions with a statistically significant lower score among BMSM versus non-Black MSM included statements such as, comfortable having sex without a condom ( p = 0.003) and less anxious about sex ( p < 0.001). We conclude HIV prevention strategies, programs, and interventions should be cognizant of PrEP perceptions that facilitate or hinder PrEP uptake in Baltimore City, MD.
public, environmental & occupational health