Abstract:Background: Health systems had to rapidly implement infection control strategies to sustain their workforces during the COVID-19 pandemic. Various outbreak response tools, such as digital contact tracing (DCT), have been developed to monitor exposures and symptoms of health care workers (HCWs). Limited research evidence exists on the experiences with these technologies and the impacts of DCT innovations from the perspective of stakeholders in health care environments. Objective: This study aims to identify the factors influencing the adoption of DCT, highlight variations in perspectives across 3 key stakeholder groups concerning the impact of DCT, and provide benchmarking evidence for future pandemic preparedness. Methods: Guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, we conducted an exploratory qualitative study to investigate the implementation and impact of DCT at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario between December 2022 and April 2023. We conducted 21 semistructured interviews with key stakeholders, including health care administrators (6/21, 29%), occupational health and safety specialists (8/21, 38%), and HCWs (7/21, 33%). Stakeholders were asked about the factors influencing engagement with the DCT tool, organizational-level uptake, the implementation process, long-term use and sustainability of DCT, and unintended consequences. Verbatim transcripts were subject to thematic analysis using NVivo (QSR International). Results: The implementation of DCT was viable and well received. End users indicated that their engagement with the DCT tool was facilitated by its perceived ease of use and the ability to gain awareness of probable COVID-19 exposures; however, risk assessment consequences and access concerns were reported as barriers ( reach ). Participants commonly agreed that the DCT technology had a positive influence on the hospital's capacity to meet the demands of COVID-19 ( effectiveness ). Implementors and occupational specialists referred to negative staffing impacts and the loss of nuanced information as unintended consequences ( effectiveness ). Safety-focused communication strategies and having a DCT tool that was human-centered were crucial factors driving staff adoption of the technology. Conversely, adoption was challenged by the misaligned delivery of the DCT tool with HCWs' standard practices, alongside the evolving perceived threat of COVID-19. Stakeholders collectively agreed on the viability of DCT and its applicability to infectious disease practices ( maintenance ). Conclusions: Hospital stakeholders were highly satisfied with DCT technology and it was perceived as feasible, efficient, and having a positive impact on organizational safety. Challenges related to the alignment and delivery of DCT, alongside the evolving perspectives on COVID-19, posed obstacles to continued adoption by HCWs. Our findings contribute to evidence-based practices and present benchmarks that can inform preparedness for future pandemics and infectious disease outbreaks and help other organizations implement similar technologies.

"We could have used a lot more of this before...": A Qualitative Study Understanding barriers and facilitators to implementing a Provincial PPE Safety Coach Program during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Teaching Adequate Prehospital Use of Personal Protective Equipment During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development of a Gamified e-Learning Module

"One minute it's an airborne virus, then it's a droplet virus, and then it's like nobody really knows…": Experiences of pandemic PPE amongst Australian healthcare workers

Factors influencing self-reported facial-protective equipment adherence among home care nurses and personal support workers: A multisite cross-sectional study

Masked and distanced: a qualitative study of how personal protective equipment and distancing affect teamwork in emergency care

Implementing coaching programmes for healthcare professionals—A review of the barriers and facilitators

'Shifting from anxiety to the new normal': A qualitative exploration on personal protective equipment use by otorhinolaryngology health-care professionals during COVID-19 pandemic

Protected code blue: using in situ simulation to develop a protected code blue and modify staff training protocol—experience in a large community teaching hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic

Digital Contact Tracing Implementation Among Leaders and Health Care Workers in a Pediatric Hospital During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Interview Study

Family physicians' responses to personal protective equipment shortages in four regions in Canada: a qualitative study

Personal protective equipment and medical students in times of COVID-19: experiences and perspectives from the final clerkship year

Lessons learned from the experiences and perspectives of frontline healthcare workers on the COVID-19 response: a qualitative descriptive study

Mixed-Methods Survey of Healthcare Workers' Experiences of Personal Protective Equipment during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Aotearoa/New Zealand

Healthcare worker perception of a global outbreak of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and personal protective equipment: Survey of a pediatric tertiary-care hospital

A mixed methods process evaluation of a peer coaching intervention to improve the implementation of preventive tasks by occupational physicians

National Initiative Pivots Amid a Global Pandemic: Lessons Learned From the InSideOut Initiative

Beliefs, preferences, and acceptance of personal protective equipment for a shock room team in a tertiary care center

Perspectives of paediatric hospital staff on factors influencing the sustainability and spread of a safety quality improvement programme

Personal protective equipment and intensive care unit healthcare worker safety in the COVID-19 era (PPE-SAFE): An international survey

Care Workers and Managers’ Experiences of Implementing Infection Control Guidance in an Epidemic Context: A Qualitative Study in the South East of England, during the COVID-19 Prevaccination Era

Implementation facilitators and barriers of stress first aid to protect mental health of frontline health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study