Long-Term Effectiveness of a Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Older People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective Study
Sarah Gephine,Olivier Le Rouzic,François Machuron,Benoit Wallaert,Cécile Chenivesse,Didier Saey,François Maltais,Patrick Mucci,Jean-Marie Grosbois
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S268901
2020-10-15
International Journal of COPD
Abstract:Sarah Gephine, 1, 2 Olivier Le Rouzic, 3, 4 François Machuron, 5 Benoit Wallaert, 3 Cécile Chenivesse, 3, 4 Didier Saey, 2 François Maltais, 2 Patrick Mucci, 1 Jean-Marie Grosbois 6 1 Univ. Lille, Univ. Artois, Univ. Littoral Côte d'Opale, ULR 7369 - URePSSS - Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport Santé Société, Lille F-59000, France; 2 Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada; 3 CHU Lille, Service de Pneumologie et Immuno-Allergologie, Centre de Référence Constitutif des Maladies Pulmonaires Rares, Lille F-59000, France; 4 Univ. Lille, Lille F-59000, France; 5 Department of Biostatistics, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, EA 2694 - Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille F-59000, France; 6 FormAction Santé, Pérenchies, France Correspondence: Jean-Marie Grosbois FormAction Santé, Pérenchies, Zone d'Activité du Bois, Rue de Pietralunga, Pérenchies, F-59840, France Email jmgrosbois@formactionsante.com Background: Long-term effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is still uncertain in older people with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The objective was to compare the effects of home-based PR in people with COPD above and below the age of 70 years. Methods: In this retrospective study, 480 people with COPD were recruited and divided into those ≤ 70 (n=341) and those > 70 years of age (n=139). All participants underwent an 8 weeks of home-based PR, consisting of a weekly supervised 90-minute home session. Six-minute stepper test (6MST), timed-up and go test (TUG), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Visual Simplified Respiratory Questionnaire (VSRQ) were assessed at baseline (M0), at 2 (M2), 8 (M8), 14 (M14) months after baseline. Results: The older group was described by fewer current smokers (p < 0.001), more long-term oxygen therapy use (p = 0.024), higher prevalence of comorbidities (p< 0.001), lower 6MST score and higher TUG score (p< 0.001), compared to the younger group. Both groups improved every outcome at M2 compared to baseline. At M2, 88% of people ≤ 70 years of age and 79% of those above 70 were considered as responders in at least one evaluated parameter (p = 0.013). Both groups maintained the benefits at M14, except for the VSRQ score and the number of responders to this outcome in the older group. Conclusion: Regardless of the age, personalized home-based PR was effective for people with COPD in the short term. Above 70 years, an ageing effect appeared on the long-term effectiveness of quality of life benefit. Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, exercise tolerance, pulmonary rehabilitation, quality of life, older age
respiratory system