Elastic Microstaggered Porous Superhydrophilic Framework as a Robust Fogwater Harvester

Jinghui Li,Chunlei Gao,Wenle Pei,Zhenyu Guo,Lieshuang Zhong,Yufang Liu,Shaomin Wang,Yongping Hou,Yongmei Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c15633
2020-10-07
Abstract:A robust fogwater harvester with an elastic microstaggered porous superhydrophilic framework (EMSF) has been designed. The EMSF can be fabricated by using polydimethylsiloxane and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) via an etching method of sugar crystals pile-up cube as a template. The EMSF possesses a high porosity of 76%, of which the saturated fogwater-capturing capacity is 4 times higher than its weight, achieving a high fogwater harvesting rate (ε) of 62.7 g/cm<sup>3</sup>·h. It is attributed to the strong hydrogen bond (H-bond) interaction between hydroxyl groups (−OH) in PVA and water molecules for rapidly harvesting water and storing water in a staggered porous structure by means of a capillary force. The elasticity of EMSF allows to achieve a higher fogwater harvesting rate (ε) of 73.2 g/cm<sup>3</sup>·h via releasing the as-stored water in the EMSF under periodic external pressing. In addition, a durable corrosion resistance is demonstrated on the EMSF. This study offers a way to design novel materials that would further be extended into applications, for example, fog engineering in industry, agriculture, forest, and so forth.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c15633?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c15633</a>.SEM image of the tough structure on surface of skeleton in EMSF; comparison of superhydrophilic stability versus storage days between two samples; test of adhesive forces and dynamic CA; schematic illustration of fog harvesting process; fog harvesting process of Ps and schematic mechanism of fog capturing behavior of Ps; stress–strain curve and stress remaining and plastic deformation of Ps during 20 cycles; water collection devices; SEM images of EMSF after acid and alkali corrosion; comparison of water collection amounts in 90 min for Ps and EMSF between acid and alkali treated; and comparison of water harvesting rate of other 1D, 2D, and 3D fog collectors in the recent as-reported literature (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.0c15633/suppl_file/am0c15633_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)Dynamic CA test of EMSF (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.0c15633/suppl_file/am0c15633_si_002.avi">AVI</a>)Dynamic CA test of PS (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.0c15633/suppl_file/am0c15633_si_003.avi">AVI</a>)Dynamic CA test of PDMS surface (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.0c15633/suppl_file/am0c15633_si_004.avi">AVI</a>)Dynamic CA test of the PVA surface (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.0c15633/suppl_file/am0c15633_si_005.avi">AVI</a>)Water harvesting task of EMSF (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.0c15633/suppl_file/am0c15633_si_006.avi">AVI</a>)Weak water harvesting performance of Ps (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.0c15633/suppl_file/am0c15633_si_007.avi">AVI</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?