Abstract:Corporate environmental and social reporting lacks the comparability across companies that is a characteristic of financial information. To address this weakness, Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) created analytical frameworks to measure the quality and scope of reporting relating to three focus areas: climate change, water and children’s rights. By translating information published by a global set of companies into standardized data, NBIM has constructed a dataset that can be used for analyzing and comparing companies across time and within sectors. The purpose of this project is to understand the value relevance of NBIM’s dataset. First, we model the determinants of the disclosure scores and climate change performance score. Consistent with prior literature, we find that firms that are larger, higher growth, less closely held and with higher analyst coverage tend to disclose more. We find that the climate change performance score is less a function of observable firm characteristics and is more idiosyncratic. This highlights the different dynamics of measures that capture actual performance, versus metrics that capture disclosures of efforts. Next, we take the ‘residual’ scores – the part of the scores that is uncorrelated with observable firm characteristics, industry and country membership – and test for associations with future financial performance. Across all of our models, the residual disclosure score is not robustly correlated with any metric of future financial performance. However, we find that the residual component of the climate change performance score is significantly related to future financial performance. We find even stronger associations for the subset of firms that have above median exposure to climate change risks. We perform supplementary analysis to understand the motivation behind these disclosures. We find that some firms choose to disclose more because they are currently facing more problems, as measured by the level of negative media attention that the firm receives on the focal issue. We also find that firms disclosing more in the past received more negative media attention on that focal issue in the future. These results hold after controlling for factors, such as firm size, that influence both media attention and disclosure levels. This suggests that higher disclosure around an issue is not necessarily indicative of better current or future performance on the issue but in some cases, it is a signal of future bad news. Conversely, we find a negative relation between the climate change performance score and the current level of negative media attention, suggesting that this performance measure indeed captures meaningful efforts to manage climate-related risks.

Value relevance of the components of oil and gas reserve quantity change disclosures of upstream oil and gas companies in the london stock exchange

Value Relevance of Environmental Sustainability Information Disclosure

Determinants of sustainability reporting on oil and gas companies in Nigeria

Environmental accounting information disclosure and shareholders’ investment decisions in listed oil and gas firms in Nigeria

The Value Relevance Study Of The Allocation Of Assets Impairment Reserves

The Value Relevance of Corporate Sustainability Disclosures: An Analysis of a Dataset from One Large Asset Owner

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE AND VALUE OF LISTED OIL AND GAS COMPANIES IN NIGERIA: THE MODERATING EFFECT OF FOREIGN OWNERSHIP

FIRM SPECIFIC DETERMINANTS AND ITS IMPLICATION ON LISTED OIL AND GAS FIRMS PROFITABILITY IN NIGERIA

FIRM SPECIFIC DRIVERS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) DISCLOSURE AMONG OIL AND MULTINATIONALS IN NIGERIA

Effect of Employee Health and Safety Cost on Profitability of Listed Oil and Gas Companies in Nigeria

The Implication of IFRS Financial Instruments Disclosure on Value Relevance

Research Methods of Main Parameter Sensitivity Differences in China's Dynamic Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation under SEC Standards

Unearthing the pressures: An assessment of the sustainability focus and supply chain management practices adopted by global oil and gas titans

EXPLORING INVESTOR'S DECISIONS IN ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF EARNING PERSISTENCE, FINANCIAL LEVERAGE, FOREIGN OWNERSHIP ON COMPANY REPUTATION AND VALUE IN NIGERIA

Factors Affecting the Value-Relevance of Capitalized Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures Under IFRS 6

Evolution of Accounting Practices for Usage of Accounting Estimates As for Disclosure of Reporting Information on ESG Factors and Risks

Block-holder ownership: Moderating the relationship between sustainability disclosure and the value of manufacturing companies in Nigeria

Market capitalization and enterprise value of the world's leading publicly traded oil and gas corporations as an indicator of the investment attractiveness of domestic vertically integrated oil and gas companies

Oil information uncertainty and aggregate market returns: A natural experiment based on satellite data

Supply Chain Disruption Risk and Market Performance in Nigeria: A Case of Oil and Gas Marketing Companies

The Value Relevance of Accounting Information: Profitability and Non-Public Ownership In Investment Decision Making