Abstract:Background: Athletes who compete in flexibility sports (FS) place unique demands on their hip joints because of the supraphysiologic range of motion required. Purpose: To compare the pathologic features, outcomes, and return-to-sports (RTS) rates of high-level athletes participating in FS who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and labral tear against a propensity score-matched cohort of high-level athletes participating in non-flexibility sports (NFS). Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed for high-level athletes who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS from April 2008 to December 2018. Patients who participated in FS such as dancing, gymnastics, martial arts, figure skating, and cheerleading were propensity score matched by body mass index, age at time of surgery, sex, sports competition level, and labral treatment to a cohort of high-level athletes participating in all other sports, such as distance running, soccer, volleyball, and softball. Baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative findings, and surgical procedures were compared. Minimum 2-year patient-reported outcome measures were compared for the modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Sport Specific Subscale, and visual analog scale for pain and satisfaction. Rates of secondary surgery and RTS were compared. Results: A total of 47 patients (50 hips) who participated in FS were included and propensity score matched to 130 patients (150 hips) who participated in NFS. Follow-up time was 37.5 ± 10.4 months (mean ± SD). Most patients (96.0%) were female with a mean age of 19.5 ± 7.3 years. FS athletes had significantly higher rates of femoral head cartilage lesions (Outerbridge ≥2; 12.0% vs 2.0%; P = .008) and ligamentum teres tears (48% vs 26%; P = .003). FS and NFS athletes demonstrated significant clinical improvements after surgery for all patient-reported outcome measures. Of the patients who attempted, 34 (75.6%) participating in FS were able to RTS while 11 (24.4%) were not because of ongoing hip issues. This was not significantly different than the NFS group (P = .073). Conclusion: High-level athletes who participated in FS and were treated for FAIS with hip arthroscopy exhibited higher rates of femoral head cartilage lesions and ligamentum teres tears requiring debridement when compared with a benchmark group of athletes who participated in other sports. Despite this, both groups demonstrated similar improvements in outcome scores and comparable rates of RTS at minimum 2-year follow-up.

THE ROLE of a BIKE FIT in CYCLISTS with HIP PAIN. A CLINICAL COMMENTARY.

A Clinically Relevant Review of Hip Biomechanics

BIOMECHANICS OF CYCLING-THE ROLE OF THE FOOT PEDAL INTERFACE

Chronic musculoskeletal conditions associated with the cycling segment of the triathlon; prevention and treatment with an emphasis on proper bicycle fitting

A literature overview of modern biomechanical-based technologies for bike-fitting professionals and coaches

Neuromuscular Hip Biomechanics and Pathology in the Athlete

A Layered Approach to the History and Physical Exam of the Athlete's Hip

The influence of abnormal hip mechanics on knee injury: a biomechanical perspective.

Alternative Models for Pelvic Marker Occlusion in Cycling

Lumbar Spine and Lower Extremity Overuse Injuries

Pathologic Findings on Hip Arthroscopy in High-Level Athletes Competing in Flexibility Sports

Managing the Hip in Supraphysiologic Motion Athletes

The Hyperflexible Hip: Managing Hip Pain in the Dancer and Gymnast

Hip Pain in Ballet Dancers: Evaluation and Management

A growing problem: cycling referrals to the National Centre for Pelvic and Acetabular Fracture Management in Ireland

Comparison Between Movement Pattern Training and Strengthening on Kinematics and Kinetics in Patients With Chronic Hip-Related Groin Pain

Hip joint biomechanics during gait in people with and without symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement

A biomechanical analysis of differences between natural and clinical angle degrees and correlations to performance in road cycling

What are participant beliefs regarding physical therapy led treatment? A qualitative study of people living with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

Hip-spine relationship: clinical evidence and biomechanical issues

Editorial Commentary: It Is Imperative to Fix Symptomatic Hip Gluteus Medius Tears at Time of Femoroacetabular Impingement: Why Ignore This Pain in the Butt?