Dohrn on the Origin of the Vertebrata and on the Principle of Succession of Functions
E. R. L.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/012479a0
IF: 64.8
1875-09-01
Nature
Abstract:THE introduction of the doctrine of Descent into the study of organic phenomena has opened the floodgates of speculation, of hypothesis, and theory. Probably, with very few exceptions, this is regarded with regret and impatience by zoologists and botanists, even though staunch Darwinian converts, who had made any name in biology in the period anterior to the publication of Mr. Darwin's work on the “Origin of Species.” Those were the days of a reaction brought about by the fantastic imaginings of Oken and his school; and the naturalists brought up in those days cannot rid themselves of a dread of speculation which has become as much an organic part of their nervous systems as has the fear of precipices, bricklayers' ladders, and of the mythological personages of their childhood, to most men. It remains for the present and later generations who will be brought up, not to fear, but to use speculation, to turn fully to account the immense engine of research which Mr. Darwin has placed in their hands. We see, in fact, no reason for refusing to welcome any number of hypotheses and theories on biological topics: let every one make his suggestion—the more ingenious and original the better—and let it be taken for what it is worth. If in its author's or another naturalist's hands it should lead to the discovery of new facts—if it should in a more or less modified form be established as true—it will bring thanks and honour to its promoter. If, on the other hand, it should lead to nothing, should be tested and found neither true nor suggestive of truth, it will fall to the ground quietly enough, and do no harm to anybody. This, be it said, applies only to the publication of such hypotheses within the scientific area—a totally different and a very grave responsibility is incurred when an author represents a hypothesis as an established doctrine, and appeals to the support of an uninstructed public. The fact is that we have acquired this freedom of speculation as compared with the proscription of it in the pre-Darwinian period, through the circumstance that biological theory has passed from the theological to the scientific form. Today—no matter who its author—a speculation as to the mode of development of this or that group of animals and the significance of this or that organ, may be verified or rejected; no one will attach undue value to it until this process has been gone through. Formerly it was not possible to test such speculations; we had in fact no link by which organic phenomena were made part of the whole series of phenomena of which science takes cognisance, and biology had no foundation in the so-called experimental sciences. Hence speculations were liable (as in theological discussion) to be launched by authorities, and to be received not as speculation, but as something like inspiration, by disciples; and on the other hand to be rigorously and almost puritanically tabooed by a constantly increasing number who, refusing to occupy themselves with these vain imaginings, endeavoured to keep the facts pure and undefiled, waiting for the coming of an interpreter—who was realised in Mr. Darwin. The doctrine of organic evolution as elaborated by Mr. Darwin and his immediate successors has provided us with a proper scientific framework, and we can now proceed to build on that by the legitimate methods of inodern inductive science. It will be some time before biology fully emerges from its theological form; at least another generation must pass; and in the mean time we must expect the continuation of special claims on the Part of authorities to advance speculative doctrines ex cathedrâ; and on the other hand a lingering antagonism to all speculation, even to that which makes no pretension to authority, on the part of those who have imbibed the horror of fantastic “Natur-philosophie” and of dogmatic pretensions.
multidisciplinary sciences