"Fighting the past to win the future: Regulatory roulette, institutional inertia and the challenge of enabling military energy security"

Ashley Wilson,Peter Connor,Jeff Hardy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103584
IF: 8.514
2024-05-23
Energy Research & Social Science
Abstract:The Ministry of Defence (MoD) owns over 1 % of UK land assets and is the one of the highest UK Departmental energy consumers. Its size and scope therefore render it a critical enabler of UK energy security and central Government decarbonisation goals. Despite strategic support to facilitate a Departmental Renewable Energy Transition (RET) to increase energy security and reduce emissions, little has been delivered. To date, there is very limited academic research into RET at the Departmental level. Using the MoD as a case Study, this paper provides the first analysis of the challenges the Department faces. The research utilises Q-methodology to analyse the challenges from the perspective of the Departmental staff and wider Government enablers. Five distinguishable discourses were derived: 'Resource pressures', 'Generalist leadership', 'Unmanageable scope', 'Failing delivery agent' and 'Unsupportive policy and process'. Some alignment to specific discourses was found with staff role, experience, and seniority. All discourses indicated internal and external layers of institutional inertia hampered progress. There was agreement across the discourses that inherent inflexibility in Governmental financial processes was a key challenge. A further risk to facilitating the transition was staff unfamiliarity with policy.
environmental studies
What problem does this paper attempt to address?