Automation of Quantifying Axonal Loss in Patients with Peripheral Neuropathies through Deep Learning Derived Muscle Fat Fraction

Yongsheng Chen,Daniel Moiseev,Wan Yee Kong,Alexandar Bezanovski,Jun Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27508
IF: 4.4
2021-01-14
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Axonal loss denervates muscle, leading to an increase of fat accumulation in the muscle. Therefore, fat fraction (FF) in whole limb muscle using MRI has emerged as a monitoring biomarker for axonal loss in patients with peripheral neuropathies. In this study, we are testing whether deep learning‐based model can automate quantification of the FF in individual muscles. While individual muscle is smaller with irregular shape, manually segmented muscle MRI images have been accumulated in this lab; and make the deep learning feasible.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>To automate segmentation on muscle MRI images through deep learning for quantifying individual muscle FF in patients with peripheral neuropathies.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Study Type</h3><p>Retrospective.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Subjects</h3><p>24 patients and 19 healthy controls.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Field Strength/Sequences</h3><p>3T; Interleaved 3D GRE.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Assessment</h3><p>A 3D U‐Net model was implemented in segmenting muscle MRI images. This was enabled by leveraging a large set of manually segmented muscle MRI images. B<sub>1</sub><sup>+</sup> and B<sub>1</sub><sup>−</sup> maps were used to correct image inhomogeneity. Accuracy of the automation was evaluated using Pixel Accuracy (PA), Dice Coefficient (DC) in binary masks; and Bland‐Altman and Pearson correlation by comparing FF values between manual and automated methods. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Statistical Tests</h3><p>PA and DC were reported with their median value and standard deviation. Two methods were compared using the ± 95% confidence intervals (CI) of Bland‐Altman analysis and the Pearson's coefficient (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup>). </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>DC values were from 0.83 ± 0.17 to 0.98 ± 0.02 in thigh and from 0.63 ± 0.18 to 0.96 ± 0.02 in calf muscles. For FF values, the overall ± 95% CI and <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> were [0.49, –0.56] and 0.989 in thigh and [0.84, –0.71] and 0.971 in the calf. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Data Conclusion</h3><p>Automated results well agreed with the manual results in quantifying FF for individual muscles. This method mitigates the formidable time consumption and intense labor in manual segmentations; and enables the use of individual muscle FF as outcome measures in upcoming longitudinal studies.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Level of Evidence</h3><p>3</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Technical Efficacy Stage</h3><p>1</p></section>
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?