Abstract:Tropospheric vertical column densities (VCDs) of NO2, SO2 and HCHO derived from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on AURA and the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment 2 aboard METOP-A (GOME-2A) and METOP-B (GOME-2B) are widely used to characterize the global distributions, trends and dominating sources of these trace gases. They are also useful for the comparison with chemical transport models (CTMs). We use tropospheric VCDs and vertical profiles of NO2, SO2 and HCHO derived from MAX-DOAS measurements from 2011 to 2014 in Wuxi, China, to validate the corresponding products (daily and bi-monthly-averaged data) derived from OMI and GOME-2A/B by different scientific teams. Prior to the comparison, the spatial and temporal coincidence criteria for MAX-DOAS and satellite data are determined by a sensitivity study using different spatial and temporal averaging conditions. Cloud effects on both MAX-DOAS and satel-lite observations are also investigated. Our results indicate that the discrepancies between satellite and MAX-DOAS results increase with increasing effective cloud fraction and are dominated by the effects of clouds on the satellite products. In comparison with MAX-DOAS, we found a systematic underestimation of all SO2 (40 to 57 %) and HCHO products (about 20 %), and an overestimation of the GOME2A/B NO2 products (about 30 %), but good consistency with the DOMINO version 2 NO2 product. To better understand the reasons for these differences, we evaluated the a priori profile shapes used in the OMI retrievals (derived from CTM) by comparison with those derived from the MAX-DOAS observations. Significant differences are found for the SO2 and HCHO profile shapes derived from the IMAGES model, whereas on average good agreement is found for the NO2 profile shapes derived from the TM4 model. We also applied the MAX-DOAS profile shapes to the satellite retrievals and found that these modified satellite VCDs agree better with the MAX-DOAS VCDs than the VCDs from the original data sets by up to 10, 47 and 35% for NO2, SO2 and HCHO, respectively. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of aerosols on the satellite retrievals. For OMI observations of NO2, a systematic underestimation is found for large AOD, which is mainly attributed to effect of the aerosols on the cloud retrieval and the subsequent application of a cloud correction scheme (implicit aerosol correction). In contrast, the effect of aerosols on the clear-sky air mass factor (explicit aerosol correction) has a smaller effect. For SO2 and HCHO observations selected in the same way, no clear aerosol effect is found, probably because for the considered data sets no cloud correction is applied (and also because of the larger scatter). From our findings we conclude that for satellite observations with cloud top pressure (CTP) > 900 hPa and effective cloud fraction (eCF) < 10% the application of a clearsky air mass factor might be a good option if accurate aerosol information is not available. Another finding of our study is that the ratio of morning-to-afternoon NO2 VCDs can be considerably overestimated if results from different sensors and/or retrievals (e.g. OMI and GOME-2) are used, whereas fewer deviations for HCHO and SO2 VCDs are found.

Version 1 NOAA-20/OMPS Nadir Mapper Total Column SO2 Product: Continuation of NASA Long-term Global Data Record

Validation of Omi, Gome-2a and Gome-2b Tropospheric No2, So2 and Hcho Products Using Max-Doas Observations from 2011 to 2014 in Wuxi, China: Investigation of the Effects of Priori Profiles and Aerosols on the Satellite Products

The global daily High Spatial–Temporal Coverage Merged tropospheric NO2 dataset (HSTCM-NO2) from 2007 to 2022 based on OMI and GOME-2

SO2 Emission Estimates Using OMI SO2 Retrievals for 2005–2017

NO2 retrievals from NOAA-20 OMPS: Algorithm, evaluation, and observations of drastic changes during COVID-19

Supplementary Material to "global Retrieval of TROPOMI Tropospheric HCHO and NO2 Columns with Improved Consistency Based on Updated Peking University OMI NO2 Algorithm"

Global retrieval of TROPOMI tropospheric HCHO and NO2 columns with improved consistency based on updated Peking University OMI NO2 algorithm

Validation of OMI, GOME-2A and GOME-2B tropospheric NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;, SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; and HCHO products using MAX-DOAS observations from 2011 to 2014 in Wuxi, China

Evaluation of the performance of Suomi-NPP OMPS nadir mapper products using station measurements and OMI data

Decade‐Long Ozone Profile Record From Suomi NPP OMPS Limb Profiler: Assessment of Version 2.6 Data

Recent Improvements to NOAA-20 Ozone Mapper Profiler Suite Nadir Profiler Sensor Data Records.

A research product for tropospheric NO2 columns from Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer based on Peking University OMI NO2 algorithm

Supplementary Material to "POMINO-GEMS: A Research Product for Tropospheric NO2 Columns from Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer"

Validation of total ozone column derived from OMPS using ground-based spectroradiometer measurements

Improved Aerosol Correction For Omi Tropospheric No2 Retrieval Over East Asia: Constraint From Caliop Aerosol Vertical Profile

OMPS LP Version 2.0 Multi-wavelength Aerosol Extinction Coefficient Retrieval Algorithm

Calibration and Validation of NOAA-21 Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) Nadir Mapper Sensor Data Record Data

Long-term MAX-DOAS Network Observations of NO2 in Russia and Asia (MADRAS) During the Period 2007–2012: Instrumentation, Elucidation of Climatology, and Comparisons with OMI Satellite Observations and Global Model Simulations

Comparison of Suomi-NPP OMPS Total Column Ozone with Brewer and Dobson Spectrophotometers Measurements

Satellite remote-sensing capability to assess tropospheric-column ratios of formaldehyde and nitrogen dioxide: case study during the Long Island Sound Tropospheric Ozone Study 2018 (LISTOS 2018) field campaign

Revising the slant column density retrieval of nitrogen dioxide observed by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument