Epigenetic and Genomic Hallmarks of PARP-Inhibitor Resistance in Ovarian Cancer Patients

Tugce Senturk Kirmizitas,Caroline van den Berg,Ruben Boers,Jean Helmijr,Stavros Makrodimitris,Hamit Harun Dag,Marijn Kerkhofs,Corine Beaufort,Jaco Kraan,Wilfred F. J. van IJcken,Joost Gribnau,Pakriti Garkhail,Gatske Nieuwenhuyzen-de Boer,Eva-Maria Roes,Heleen van Beekhuizen,Tuba Gunel,Saskia Wilting,John Martens,Maurice Jansen,Ingrid Boere
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15060750
IF: 4.141
2024-06-08
Genes
Abstract:Background: Patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) receive treatment with a poly-ADP ribose-polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (PARPi) as maintenance therapy after surgery and chemotherapy. Unfortunately, many patients experience disease progression because of acquired therapy resistance. This study aims to characterize epigenetic and genomic changes in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) associated with PARPi resistance. Materials and Methods: Blood was taken from 31 EOC patients receiving PARPi therapy before treatment and at disease progression during/after treatment. Resistance was defined as disease progression within 6 months after starting PARPi and was seen in fifteen patients, while sixteen patients responded for 6 to 42 months. Blood cfDNA was evaluated via Modified Fast Aneuploidy Screening Test-Sequencing System (mFast-SeqS to detect aneuploidy, via Methylated DNA Sequencing (MeD-seq) to find differentially methylated regions (DMRs), and via shallow whole-genome and -exome sequencing (shWGS, exome-seq) to define tumor fractions and mutational signatures. Results: Aneuploid cfDNA was undetectable pre-treatment but observed in six patients post-treatment, in five resistant and one responding patient. Post-treatment ichorCNA analyses demonstrated in shWGS and exome-seq higher median tumor fractions in resistant (7% and 9%) than in sensitive patients (7% and 5%). SigMiner analyses detected predominantly mutational signatures linked to mismatch repair and chemotherapy. DeSeq2 analyses of MeD-seq data revealed three methylation signatures and more tumor-specific DMRs in resistant than in responding patients in both pre- and post-treatment samples (274 vs. 30 DMRs, 190 vs. 57 DMRs, Χ2-test p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our genome-wide Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) analyses in PARPi-resistant patients identified epigenetic differences in blood before treatment, whereas genomic alterations were more frequently observed after progression. The epigenetic differences at baseline are especially interesting for further exploration as putative predictive biomarkers for PARPi resistance.
genetics & heredity
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to solve the problem of drug resistance in ovarian cancer patients after receiving PARP inhibitor (PARPi) treatment. Specifically, the goal of the study is to identify epigenetic and genomic features related to PARPi resistance by analyzing circulating cell - free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma. These features may help predict which patients will develop resistance to PARPi treatment, thus providing guidance for clinical treatment. ### Research Background - **Disease Background**: High - grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common type of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), accounting for 75% of all cases. Most patients will relapse after initial chemotherapy and surgery and eventually die of this disease. - **Treatment Status**: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been proven to be particularly effective in patients carrying BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. However, many patients will develop drug resistance during the treatment process, leading to disease progression. ### Research Objectives - **Main Objective**: Identify epigenetic and genomic features related to PARPi resistance by analyzing cfDNA in plasma. - **Specific Objectives**: - **Epigenetic Features**: Detect differentially methylated regions (DMRs) by methylation - DNA sequencing (MeD - seq). - **Genomic Features**: Detect genomic alterations, including copy number variations (CNVs) and mutation signatures, by shallow whole - genome sequencing (shWGS) and exome - sequencing (exome - seq). - **Comprehensive Analysis**: Combine the above methods to evaluate the relationship between these features and PARPi resistance. ### Method Overview - **Sample Collection**: Blood samples were collected from 31 HGSOC patients receiving PARPi maintenance treatment, collected before treatment and at the time of disease progression respectively. - **Sequencing Technologies**: - **mFast - SeqS**: Used to detect chromosomal aneuploidy. - **MeD - seq**: Used to detect DNA methylation. - **shWGS and exome - seq**: Used to detect genomic alterations and mutation signatures. - **Data Analysis**: - **mFast - SeqS**: Calculate the Z - score in the genome - wide range (GWZ) to evaluate the level of aneuploidy. - **MeD - seq**: Use the DeSeq2 tool to detect differentially methylated regions (DMRs). - **shWGS and exome - seq**: Use the ichorCNA tool to estimate the tumor proportion and ploidy level, and use the SigMiner tool to detect mutation signatures. ### Main Findings - **Genomic Features**: - No high GWZ scores were detected in the pre - treatment samples, indicating no obvious aneuploidy. - In the post - treatment samples, some patients (especially resistant patients) showed high GWZ scores and high tumor proportions. - **Epigenetic Features**: - Resistant patients showed more differentially methylated regions (DMRs) both before and after treatment. - Three epigenetic features (dynamic tumor evolution marker, PARPi prediction marker, and PARPi response marker) were defined, and some DMRs were significantly associated with the time to treatment failure. ### Conclusions - **Main Conclusion**: The study found epigenetic and genomic features related to PARPi resistance, especially the epigenetic differences before treatment may serve as potential biomarkers for predicting PARPi resistance. - **Future Directions**: Further verify the predictive value of these biomarkers in a larger patient cohort, and explore the potential of these biomarkers for clinical application. Through these findings, the study provides a new perspective for understanding the PARPi resistance mechanism and lays the foundation for the development of more effective personalized treatment strategies.