Abstract:Abstract Whole-genome duplication (WGD) occurs broadly and repeatedly across the history of eukaryotes and is recognized as a prominent evolutionary force, especially in plants. Immediately following WGD, most genes are present in two copies as paralogs. Due to this redundancy, one copy of a paralog pair commonly undergoes pseudogenization and is eventually lost. When speciation occurs shortly after WGD; however, differential loss of paralogs may lead to spurious phylogenetic inference resulting from the inclusion of pseudoorthologs–paralogous genes mistakenly identified as orthologs because they are present in single copies within each sampled species. The influence and impact of including pseudoorthologs versus true orthologs as a result of gene extinction (or incomplete laboratory sampling) are only recently gaining empirical attention in the phylogenomics community. Moreover, few studies have yet to investigate this phenomenon in an explicit coalescent framework. Here, using mathematical models, numerous simulated data sets, and two newly assembled empirical data sets, we assess the effect of pseudoorthologs on species tree estimation under varying degrees of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and differential gene loss scenarios following WGD. When gene loss occurs along the terminal branches of the species tree, alignment-based (BPP) and gene-tree-based (ASTRAL, MP-EST, and STAR) coalescent methods are adversely affected as the degree of ILS increases. This can be greatly improved by sampling a sufficiently large number of genes. Under the same circumstances, however, concatenation methods consistently estimate incorrect species trees as the number of genes increases. Additionally, pseudoorthologs can greatly mislead species tree inference when gene loss occurs along the internal branches of the species tree. Here, both coalescent and concatenation methods yield inconsistent results. These results underscore the importance of understanding the influence of pseudoorthologs in the phylogenomics era. [Coalescent method; concatenation method; incomplete lineage sorting; pseudoorthologs; single-copy gene; whole-genome duplication.]

The Effect of Copy Number Hemiplasy on Gene Family Evolution

The Multilocus Multispecies Coalescent: A Flexible New Model of Gene Family Evolution

Counting and sampling gene family evolutionary histories in the duplication-loss and duplication-loss-transfer models

Determining the evolutionary history of gene families

Species Tree Estimation and the Impact of Gene Loss Following Whole-Genome Duplication

DISCO: Species Tree Inference using Multicopy Gene Family Tree Decomposition

Reconciling Multiple Genes Trees via Segmental Duplications and Losses

Anomaly zones for uniformly sampled gene trees under the gene duplication and loss model

Analysis of gene copy number changes in tumor phylogenetics

Species Tree Inference Methods Intended to Deal with Incomplete Lineage Sorting Are Robust to the Presence of Paralogs

A Probabilistic Model for Gene Content Evolution with Duplication, Loss, and Horizontal Transfer

An Atlas of the Speed of Copy Number Changes in Animal Gene Families and Its Implications

A probabilistic version of Sankoff's maximum parsimony algorithm

Maximum Parsimony Analysis of Gene Copy Number Changes

Coalescent Methods Are Robust to the Simultaneous Effects of Long Branches and Incomplete Lineage Sorting

Gene-Tree Reconciliation with MUL-Trees to Resolve Polyploidy Events

Genes with Minimal Phylogenetic Information Are Problematic for Coalescent Analyses when Gene Tree Estimation is Biased

DupLoss-2: Improved Phylogenomic Species Tree Inference under Gene Duplication and Loss

The Influence of the Number of Tree Searches on Maximum Likelihood Inference in Phylogenomics.

Synteny-Guided Resolution of Gene Trees Clarifies the Functional Impact of Whole-Genome Duplications

The Inference of Gene Trees with Species Trees