Abstract:Purpose. To analyze the clinical significance of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic assessment of sepsis. Methods. 140 patients with sepsis from January 2020 to January 2021 were selected as the observation group, and 40 healthy people were selected as the control group. The observation group was divided into mild group, severe group, and septic shock group by single blind grouping according to the condition of the disease, and they were also divided into survival group and death group according to the prognosis. Collect the fasting venous blood of the subjects in each group in the morning, compare the levels of total bilirubin (TBIL), blood creatinine (CR), and platelet count (PLT) in each group, and record and compare the patients' respiratory system oxygen partial pressure/inhaled oxygen concentration (po2/fio2), acute physiology and chronic health scoring system II (APACHE II), sequential organ failure assessment (sofa) score, q-SOFA score, and △SOFA score; Pearson analysis was used to analyze the correlation between SOFA score and other indicators; multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the prognostic risk factors of patients with sepsis; receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to analyze the value of SOFA score alone and in combination in the diagnosis, condition, and prognosis of sepsis. Results. There were significant differences in Apache II score, SOFA score, q-SOFA score map, po2/fio2, PLT, GCS, TBIL, and serum creatinine (SCR) between the control group and the observation group ( P < 0.05 ). There were significant differences in Apache II score, SOFA score, q-SOFA score, mean arterial pressure (map) po2/fio2, PLT, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), TBIL, SCR, and △SOFA score among patients in mild, severe, and septic shock groups ( P < 0.05 ). There were significant differences in age, Apache II score, SOFA score, q-SOFA score, map, po2/fio2, PLT, GCS, TBIL, SCR, and △SOFA score between survival group and death group ( P < 0.05 ). SOFA score and q-SOFA score were significantly positively correlated with TBIL and SCR and significantly negatively correlated with po2/fio2 and PLT; △SOFA score was significantly negatively correlated with TBIL and SCR and significantly positively correlated with map, po2/fio2, PLT, and GCS. Apache II score, SOFA score, and q-SOFA score were independent risk factors for sepsis patients, and △SOFA score, po2/fio2, and GCS score were protective factors ( P < 0.05 ). ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of sepsis combined with SOFA score and q-SOFA score was 0.880; the AUC of sepsis assessed by SOFA score, q-SOFA score, and △SOFA score was 0.929; the AUC of sepsis prognosis assessed by SOFA score, q-SOFA score, and △SOFA score was 0.900. Conclusion. SOFA score, q-SOFA score, and △SOFA score were abnormally expressed in patients with sepsis and were risk factors for the severity of the patient's condition and prognosis. The SOFA score, q-SOFA score, and △SOFA score were risk factors for the severity and prognosis of patients with sepsis and had some value in diagnosing sepsis and assessing the condition and prognosis, of which the combined value of the three was higher.

Persistent high sepsis-induced coagulopathy and sequential organ failure assessment scores can predict the 28-day mortality of patients with sepsis: A prospective study

Performance of sequential organ failure assessment, logistic organ dysfunction and multiple organ dysfunction score in severe sepsis within Chinese intensive care units.

[Meta analysis of the predictive efficacy of various derived indicators of sequential organ failure assessment in outcomes of patients with sepsis].

Evaluation of Qsofa Score, and Conjugated Bilirubin and Creatinine Levels for Predicting 28-Day Mortality in Patients with Sepsis.

Comparison of Three Different Organ Failure Assessment Score Systems in Predicting Outcome of Severe Sepsis

SOFA Score in relation to Sepsis: Clinical Implications in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognostic Assessment

Usefulness of Qsofa and SIRS Scores for Detection of Incipient Sepsis in General Ward Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Prognostic Accuracy of the Different Scoring Systems for Assessing Coagulopathy in Sepsis: A Retrospective Study

[Prognosis analysis of multi-indicator combined with sequential organ failure assessment in patients with sepsis]

[Predictive value of sepsis-induced coagulopathy score on 30-day mortality in septic patients]

The Ability of an Improved Qsofa Score to Predict Acute Sepsis Severity and Prognosis among Adult Patients.

Comparison of the Performance between Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3 in Icus in China: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Maximum sequential organ failure assessment score and average sequential organ failure assessment score for prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis caused by common Gram-positive/negative bacteria

SIRS, SOFA, qSOFA, and NEWS in the diagnosis of sepsis and prediction of adverse outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Predicts Outcomes of Pulse Indicator Contour Continuous Cardiac Output-Directed Goal Therapy

Development and validation of a clinical score combining the sequential organ failure assessment score with inflammation-based markers to predict outcome of patients with sepsis.

Development and Validation of a Rapid and Efficient Prognostic Scoring System for Sepsis Based on Oxygenation Index, Lactate and Glasgow Coma Scale.

[Assessment of the severity scores in patients included in a sepsis code in an Emergency Departament]

Prognostic accuracy of SIC, JAAM DIC, and ISTH overt-DIC for 28-day all-cause mortality among patients with sepsis and coagulation abnormalities: a retrospective study

Predictive Value of Multiple Scoring Systems in the Prognosis of Septic Patients with Different Infection Sites: Analysis of the Medical Information Mart for the Intensive Care IV Database

Prognostic Accuracy of SOFA, MEWS, and SIRS Criteria in Predicting the Mortality Rate of Patients with Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis