A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability

Zemiao Zhang,Yinhuan Hu,Hao Chen,Weilin Zhu,Dehe Li,Ximin Zhu,Xiaoyue Wu,Jiayi Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.760647
IF: 5.2
2021-12-20
Frontiers in Public Health
Abstract:Background: The aim of this study is to develop a scale and evaluate its' validity and reliability to measure the joy in work of doctors. Methods: Based on literature review and panel discussion, the scale framework and item pool were determined. Next, the items were modified by two rounds of expert consultation. Then the pre-investigation was applied and the formal version of scale was formed. Last, the reliability and validity of the scale were tested with 426 physicians. Results: The scale was composed of four dimensions: work autonomy needs, competency identification needs, competency perception needs and work relationship needs. Each dimension had 7 items, and both reliability and validity were acceptable. The Cronbach α coefficient and half-reliability coefficient of the whole scale were 0.954 (>0.9) and 0.974 (>0.9). The Spearman correlations of item-total score ranged from 0.556 to 0.749, indicating a good-item total score correlation. The χ 2/ df, RMSEA, RMR, GFI, CFI, and TLI, CFA of the maximum likelihood method supported a good fit with the model. Conclusions: Based on the self-determination theory, this study develops a scale to measure the joy in work of doctors. It has good validation and reliability, which is useful for doctors and medical institutions to take steps to improve happiness.
public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?