Abstract:“Precision genome editing is a new technology that allows the modification/improvement of existing apple varieties without the introduction of foreign DNA. I believe that future apple varieties developed by precision genome editing will not be regulated by APHIS, nor objected by the antiGMO groups, the apple industry and consumers.” GMO (genetically modified organism) has been a subject of heated debate in the public since the first commercial production of GM crops in 1996. The governments around the world regulate GM crops vigorously before they are allowed to grow commercially in their countries. Improvement of traits through GM has been largely concentrated on resistance to herbicides and pest insects. Despite the limited number of GM traits, a record 18 million farmers planted 175 million hectares (432 million acres) GM crops (mainly canola, cotton, maize, soybean and sugar beet) in 27 countries in 2013 according to the latest data from International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA). Supporters of GMO view that GM crops are effective solutions for feeding the poor and hunger in the world, and believe that biotechnology is an essential tool for our society to meet with the increasing challenges in climate change, cropland decline, population growth, and increase in demand of food and feed. However, opponents of GMO argue that the impacts of GM crops on human health and the environment need to be studied more carefully before they are permitted to grow in large scale, and insist that prematurely authorizing GM crops to enter the food and feed supply systems is dangerous. These arguments primarily stem from some characteristics of GMOs, e.g. a transgene and a selectable marker gene are frequently arranged together and are co-inserted into the genome in a random fashion. One of the frequently used marker genes is nptII (neomycin phosphotransferase type II), which confers resistance to Kanamycin and Neomycin although the antibiotics have limited use in medicine nowadays and gene nptII exists in a wide range of soil microorganisms.

Regulation of genome edited organisms in Australia

Are null segregants new combinations of heritable material and should they be regulated?

Current status and prospects of plant genome editing in Australia

A comparison of the EU regulatory approach to directed mutagenesis with that of other jurisdictions, consequences for international trade and potential steps forward

A New Zealand Perspective on the Application and Regulation of Gene Editing

Precision Genome Editing May Ease Debate and Regulatory Burden on Genetically Modified Fruit

Non-safety Assessments of Genome-Edited Organisms: Should They be Included in Regulation?

A new suite of twenty-two polymorphic microsatellite loci in the parasitic wasp, Habrobracon hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): Promising molecular tools for studying the population genetics of several beneficial braconid species

Unintended Genomic Outcomes in Current and Next Generation GM Techniques: A Systematic Review

Genetic Engineering in the United States: Regulation of Crops and Their Food Products

Global Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops Amid the Gene Edited Crop Boom – A Review

Gene Editing of Microalgae: Scientific Progress and Regulatory Challenges in Europe

The Response of Enzyme Polymorphisms to Developmental Rate Selection in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Genome editing in food and agriculture: from regulations to consumer perspectives

Risk-appropriate regulations for gene-editing technologies

Precise plant breeding using new genome editing techniques: opportunities, safety and regulation in the EU.

Debating Ethical Issues in Genome Editing Technology

Recent Developments in the Regulation of Heritable Human Genome Editing

Is the only outcome that counts related to registered dietitians' recommendations?

[Magnification of surface anesthetic activity by acid medium].

Regulation of gene-edited plants in Europe: from the valley of tears into the shining sun?