Fusion with and without lever reduction in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study

Chao Kong,Dongfan Wang,Wei Wang,Yu Wang,Shibao Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04507-9

IF: 2.6

2024-01-03

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Abstract:Abstract Background The reduction of slipped vertebra is often performed during surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). This approach, while potentially improving clinical and radiological outcomes, also carries a risk of increased complications due to the reduction process. To address this, we introduced an innovative lever reduction technique for DLS treatment. This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy, radiological outcomes, and complications of fusion with or without lever reduction. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a registry of patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery for DLS, with a follow-up of at least 24 months. Self-reported measures included visual analog scale (VAS) for back or leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Radiological assessments encompassed spondylolisthesis percentage (SP), focal lordosis (FL), and lumbar lordosis (LL). Complications were categorized using the modified Clavien–Dindo classification (MCDC) scheme. Patients were assigned to the reduction group (RG) and non-reduction group (NRG) based on the application of the lever reduction technique. Clinical and radiological outcomes at baseline, immediately after surgery, and at the last follow-up were compared. Results A total of 281 patients were analyzed (123 NRG, 158 RG). Baseline patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical characteristics were similarly distributed between groups except for operating time (NRG 129.25 min, RG 138.04 min, P = .009). Both groups exhibited significant clinical improvement after surgery (all, P = .000), with no substantial difference between groups (VAS, ODI, or the ability to reach MCID). Patients in RG showed statistically lower SP and higher FL during follow-up (all, P = .000). LL was comparable at different time points within each group or at the same time point between the two groups (all, P > .050). The overall complication rate (NRG 38.2%, RG 27.2%, P = .050) or specific complication rates per MCDC were similar between groups (all, P > .050). Patients in RG were predisposed to a lower risk of adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) (NRG 9.8%, RG 6.3%, P = .035). Conclusions There were no significant differences in postoperative measures such as VAS scores for back and leg pain, ODI, the ability to reach MCID, overall complication rate, or specific complication rates per MCDC between surgical approaches. However, fusion with lever reduction demonstrated a notable advantage in restoring segmental spinal sagittal alignment and reducing the occurrence of ASDeg compared to in situ fusion.

orthopedics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is, in the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS), the impact of whether to use the lever - reduction technique for fusion on clinical efficacy, imaging results and complications. Specifically, the study aims to compare the effects of lumbar fusion surgery with and without the lever - reduction technique, in order to evaluate the advantages of the lever - reduction technique in restoring the sagittal alignment of the spinal segment and reducing adjacent - segment degeneration (ASDeg). ### Research Background Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is a common pathological condition among the elderly, characterized by the forward slippage of the superior vertebral body onto the inferior vertebral body while the neural arch remains intact. Due to spinal canal stenosis, nerve root compression and segmental instability caused by spondylolisthesis, patients often experience neurogenic claudication, sciatica or back pain. For severe cases or cases where conservative treatment is ineffective, decompression and fusion surgery are considered as means to provide satisfactory long - term results. However, whether to perform spondylolisthesis reduction during the operation still needs to be determined by the surgeon. Theoretically, the reduction process can reduce the slippage distance, increase the segmental lumbar lordosis or the disc height, which may bring better clinical results or a higher fusion rate. But traditional reduction methods mainly rely on the distraction of the intervertebral space and the direct lifting force of the pedicle screw, which may increase the risk of complications, such as neurological deficits, implant failure (screw loosening or pull - out), prolonged operation time or loss of reduction. ### Research Objectives In order to reduce the surgery - related complications associated with the reduction process, the researchers introduced a combined reduction technique that combines traditional lifting - force reduction and innovative lever - reduction. This study aims to deeply explore the clinical efficacy, imaging results and complications of lumbar fusion surgery with and without the lever - reduction technique, and provide valuable insights into the relative effectiveness and safety of these two surgical methods.

Fusion with and without lever reduction in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study

Is stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion superior to instrumented lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-level, low-grade, lumbar spondylolisthesis?

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion for severe lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Lateral Plate Fixation for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: a Preliminary Clinical Study

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined with Lateral Plate VS. Combined with Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

Posterolateral lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis

Does Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Decrease the Grading of Lenke-Silva Classification and Determine the Optimal Fusion Level in Severe Adult Degenerative Scoliosis?

Does Simultaneous Fusion of Preexisting Spinal Canal Stenosis Adjacent to Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Achieve a Better Clinical Outcome? A Retrospective Study with More than 5-year Follow-Up

Minimally Invasive Decompression With Noninstrumented Facet Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Stenosis Associated With Grade 1 Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Stand-Alone Cages for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Study with 1-Year Follow-Up

Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease

Management for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a network meta-analysis and systematic review basing on randomized controlled trials

Efficacy of Single-Position Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Cohort Study

Transforminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion in Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis：a Mid-Term Follow-Up Study

Is Reduction Better Than Arthrodesis in Situ in Surgical Management of Low-Grade Spondylolisthesis? A System Review and Meta Analysis

The efficacy and safety of decompression with interspinous fixation for lumbar spondylolisthesis when compared with posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A pilot study

Short-term and mid-term evaluation of three types of minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery for treatment of L4/L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis

Comparison of 270-degree percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression under local anesthesia and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of geriatric lateral recess stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

Does the Number of Levels of Decompression Have an Impact on the Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Study in Single-Level Fused Patients

Evaluating the efficacy and suggesting technical optimizations for endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion across different lumbar spondylolisthesis types

Distal Lumbar Lordosis is Associated With Reoperation for Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Conditions