Double-Limb Graft Versus Single-Limb Graft Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies

Long Pang,Kefan Mou,Yinghao Li,Tao Li,Jian Li,Jing Zhu,Xin Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221130448
2022-12-01
Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the most important stabilizer of lateral dislocation of the patella. Single-limb (SL) and double-limb (DL) graft MPFL reconstructions have been increasingly used to treat recurrent patellar dislocations, but the clinical efficacy of SL versus DL graft MPFL reconstructions remains controversial owing to the inconsistent conclusions of previous studies.Purpose:This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of SL and DL graft MPFL reconstructions for patients with recurrent patellar dislocation by conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.Study Design:Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. The retrieval time was up to July 25, 2022. Two evaluators independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the enrolled studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.Results:A total of 4 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies with 451 patients were included. The joint stability and functional scores in both groups improved significantly from baseline. When compared with SL graft reconstruction, DL graft reconstruction provided reduced recurrent instability (P = .01), anterior patella–related pain (P = .02), and patellar lateral shift rate (P = .02). Regarding functional recovery, patients undergoing DL graft reconstruction presented better scores on the Kujala (P < .001), Tegner (P = .009), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (P < .001) but similar Lysholm scores as compared with SL graft reconstruction. No statistically significant difference was found between the techniques in the reduction of the patellar tilt angle, complications other than anterior patella–related pain, or postoperative pain.Conclusion:When compared with SL graft MPFL reconstruction, DL graft MPFL reconstruction yielded better outcomes in terms of postoperative recurrent instability, anterior patella–related pain, patellar lateral shift rate, Kujala score, Tegner score, and IKDC score. The amount of high-quality evidence is insufficient, so this conclusion should be interpreted with caution.
orthopedics,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?