Abstract:In this article, ternary organic solar cells (T‐OSCs) are fabricated under open‐air conditions. The optimized ternary device with 20% DRCTF shows power conversion efficiency of 14.45% with enhanced short‐circuit current density, open‐circuit voltage, fill factor, and reduced non‐radiative ΔVloss. This efficiency is higher than binary counterpart (12.46%). The design approach can serve as a foundation for future T‐OSC advancements. The structural disorder and aggregation of the third acceptor with the host active layer are critical in the light absorption, film morphology, and charge‐carrier mechanism of their photovoltaic blends to achieve highly efficient organic solar cells (OSCs). However, an effective third component needs to be introduced in the host binary blend as a combination of ternary blend, which can improve the absorption profile, film morphology, and charge dynamics. In this work, non‐fullerene acceptor DRCTF is incorporated as a third component in host PM6:Y6 binary blend. Compared to host blend, the ternary blend improves charge‐transfer processes, as evidenced by steady‐state photoluminescence and time‐resolved photoluminescence measurements. It is found that the addition of 20% DRCTF into host binary blend results in improved charge dissociation and transport with reduced recombination, and voltage losses. All these characteristics contribute to an improved power conversion efficiency of 14.45% in the PM6:Y6:DRCTF ternary OSCs (T‐OSCs), compared to PM6:Y6 (12.46%) in open‐air fabrication conditions. Consequently, in this study, the impact of third components on the charge‐transfer mechanism in T‐OSCs is elucidated. These findings suggested that T‐OSCs with a perfectly chosen third component in the host binary blend achieve a comprehensive absorption profile, smooth film morphology, efficient charge dynamics, and reduced voltage loss.

Ternary Organic Solar Cells—Simulation–Optimization Approach

A Comprehensively Theoretical and Experimental Study of Carrier Generation and Transport for Achieving High Performance Ternary Blend Organic Solar Cells

Optimization of the Active Layer Thickness for Inverted Ternary Organic Solar Cells Achieves 20% Efficiency with Simulation

Organic Solar Cell Optimizations

Characterizing the Morphology and Efficiency of Organic Solar Cells by Multiscale Simulations

Ternary Strategy Enabling High‐Performance Organic Solar Cells with Optimized Film Morphology and Reduced Nonradiative Energy Loss

Exploring the Charge Dynamics and Energy Loss in Ternary Organic Solar Cells with a Fill Factor Exceeding 80%

A Near-Infrared Photoactive Morphology Modifier Leads to Significant Current Improvement and Energy Loss Mitigation for Ternary Organic Solar Cells

Exploiting Mechanism of Enhanced Charge Transfer in Ternary Organic Solar Cells at Low Energy Loss

Mitigating the Trade-Off between Non-Radiative Recombination and Charge Transport to Enable Efficient Ternary Organic Solar Cells

Electrical simulation and optimization of organic photovoltaic cells based PTB7:PC70BM

Simultaneously Decreasing the Bandgap and V oc Loss in Efficient Ternary Organic Solar Cells

Models and mechanisms of ternary organic solar cells

Highly Efficient Ternary Solar Cells with Efficient Förster Resonance Energy Transfer for Simultaneously Enhanced Photovoltaic Parameters

Efficient Ternary Organic Solar Cells with a New Electron Acceptor Based on 3,4-(2,2-Dihexylpropylenedioxy)thiophene

In-situ and Ex-situ Investigations on Ternary Strategy and Co-solvents Effects towards High-Efficiency Organic Solar Cells

Unraveling the Role of Morphology on Organic Solar Cell Performance

Improving the Efficiency of Ternary Organic Solar Cells by Reducing Energy Loss.

Efficient and 1,8-diiodooctane-free ternary organic solar cells fabricated via nanoscale morphology tuning using small-molecule dye additive

Achieving 19.72% Efficiency in Ternary Organic Solar Cells through Electrostatic Potential‐Driven Morphology Control

High-Efficiency Ternary Organic Solar Cells with a Good Figure-of-Merit Enabled by Two Low-Cost Donor Polymers