A virtual reality experiment to study pedestrian perception of future street scenarios

Javier Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo,Carina I. Hausladen,Sachit Mahajan,Marc Matter,Michael Siebenmann,Michael A. B. van Eggermond,Dirk Helbing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55073-x

IF: 4.6

2024-02-26

Scientific Reports

Abstract:The current allocation of street space is based on expected vehicular peak-hour flows. Flexible and adaptive use of this space can respond to changing needs. To evaluate the acceptability of flexible street layouts, several urban environments were designed and implemented in virtual reality. Participants explored these designs in immersive virtual reality in a mixed factorial experiment, in which we analysed self-reported, behavioural and physiological responses from participants. Distinct communication strategies were varied between subjects. Participants' responses reveal a preference for familiar solutions. Unconventional street layouts are less preferred, perceived as unsafe and cause a measurably greater stress response. Furthermore, information provision focusing on comparisons lead participants to focus primarily on the drawbacks, instead of the advantages of novel scenarios. When being able to freely express thoughts and opinions, participants are focused more on the impact of space design on behaviour rather than the objective physical features themselves. Especially, this last finding suggests that it is vital to develop new street scenarios in an inclusive and democratic way: the success of innovating urban spaces depends on how well the vast diversity of citizens' needs is considered and met.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to address the issues of urban street space design and usage, particularly in response to the challenges posed by rapid urbanization and car-centric planning. Specifically, the study attempts to evaluate pedestrians' perceptions of different future street scenarios through virtual reality (VR) experiments, including the safety, acceptability, and impact on pedestrian behavior of these scenarios. The main issues the paper seeks to address are as follows:

1. **Testing new street design schemes**:
- The study proposes three different street design schemes (current situation, inLED, no curb) aimed at addressing the problems brought by the current street space allocation and exploring more flexible and sustainable urban infrastructure designs.

2. **Evaluating public acceptance of new schemes**:
- The study focuses on public perceptions of these new street designs, particularly their safety and impact on travel patterns. The experiments found that unusual design schemes were perceived as less safe and caused greater stress responses.

3. **Evaluating the effectiveness of communication strategies**:
- The paper explores how to effectively introduce these new schemes to the public, comparing the effects of sequential video playback and split-screen video playback. The results indicate that split-screen playback helps better identify the advantages and disadvantages of each scheme.

Through the above research, the authors hope to provide references for future urban planning and design decisions, promoting the formulation of more inclusive and sustainable transportation policies.