Abstract:Background Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a common chronic disease. To manage blood glucose levels, patients need to follow medical recommendations for healthy eating, physical activity, and medication adherence in their everyday life. Illness management is mainly shared with partners and involves social support and common dyadic coping (CDC). Social support and CDC have been identified as having implications for people’s health behavior and well-being. Visible support, however, may also be negatively related to people’s well-being. Thus, the concept of invisible support was introduced. It is unknown which of these concepts (ie, visible support, invisible support, and CDC) displays the most beneficial associations with health behavior and well-being when considered together in the context of illness management in couple’s everyday life. Therefore, a novel ambulatory assessment application for the open-source behavioral intervention platform MobileCoach (AAMC) was developed. It uses objective sensor data in combination with self-reports in couple’s everyday life. Objective The aim of this paper is to describe the design of the Dyadic Management of Diabetes (DyMand) study, funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (CR12I1_166348/1). The study was approved by the cantonal ethics committee of the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland (Req-2017_00430). Methods This study follows an intensive longitudinal design with 2 phases of data collection. The first phase is a naturalistic observation phase of couples’ conversations in combination with experience sampling in their daily lives, with plans to follow 180 T2DM patients and their partners using sensor data from smartwatches, mobile phones, and accelerometers for 7 consecutive days. The second phase is an observational study in the laboratory, where couples discuss topics related to their diabetes management. The second phase complements the first phase by focusing on the assessment of a full discussion about diabetes-related concerns. Participants are heterosexual couples with 1 partner having a diagnosis of T2DM. Results The AAMC was designed and built until the end of 2018 and internally tested in March 2019. In May 2019, the enrollment of the pilot phase began. The data collection of the DyMand study will begin in September 2019, and analysis and presentation of results will be available in 2021. Conclusions For further research and practice, it is crucial to identify the impact of social support and CDC on couples’ dyadic management of T2DM and their well-being in daily life. Using AAMC will make a key contribution with regard to objective operationalizations of visible and invisible support, CDC, physical activity, and well-being. Findings will provide a sound basis for theory- and evidence-based development of dyadic interventions to change health behavior in the context of couple’s dyadic illness management. Challenges to this multimodal sensor approach and its feasibility aspects are discussed. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/13685

Predictors of collaborative coping in couples managing type 2 diabetes: Illness factors, relationship factors, and interdependent personality traits

Daily illness appraisal and collaboration in couples with type 1 diabetes.

Common dyadic coping is indirectly related to dietary and exercise adherence via patient and partner diabetes efficacy.

A communal coping intervention for couples managing chronic illness: Proof-of-concept study.

The fit between stress appraisal and dyadic coping in understanding perceived coping effectiveness for adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

"I too have a responsibility for my partner's life": Communal coping among Malawian couples living with HIV and cardiometabolic disorders

Interpersonal variables and caregiving partners' burden in cardiac illness: A longitudinal study

The associations of dyadic coping strategies with caregiver's willingness to care and burden: A weekly diary study

Social Support and Common Dyadic Coping in Couples' Dyadic Management of Type II Diabetes: Protocol for an Ambulatory Assessment Application

Is Higher Stress Associated with Higher Resilience? Exploring Married Couples’ Experiences Managing Comorbid Diabetes and Osteoarthritis

Communal Coping in Couples With Health Problems

Common dyadic coping and its congruence in couples facing breast cancer: The impact on couples' psychological distress

Interpersonal Process of Dyadic Coping in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Perspective From the Australian Rheumatology Association Database

825-P: Effects of Family-Related Factors on Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors

Associations between dyadic coping and supportive care needs: findings from a study with hematologic cancer patients and their partners

Exploring the relationships between illness perceptions, self-efficacy, coping strategies, psychological distress and quality of life in a cohort of adults with diabetes mellitus

Living with Type 2 Diabetes: A Social Cognitive Perspective on Adherence

Associations of Coping Strategies With Glycemic and Psychosocial Outcomes Among Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Experiencing Diabetes Distress

Dyadic coping and associated factors in women with high-risk pregnancy and their spouses: do they interact?

Two Is Better Than One: Dyadic Coping in the Context of Chronic Pain

Empowering Diabetes Management: the impact of patient-provider collaboration on type 2 diabetes outcomes through autonomy support and shared decision-making