The role of external iliac artery diameter indexed to BSA score in predicting vascular access complications after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Monika Gruz-Kwapisz,Tomasz Gasior,Adrianna Hajder,Wojciech Wanha,Joanna Ciosek,Andrzej Ochala,Radosław Parma,Radoslaw Gocol,Wojciech Wojakowski,Damian Hudziak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.136407
2024-01-01
Advances in Interventional Cardiology
Abstract:<sec>Introduction<p>Aortic stenosis is the most common primary valve disease and requires invasive treatment. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) from a transfemoral access is a routine intervention worldwide.</p></sec><sec>Aim<p>To investigate the correlation between external iliac artery diameter (EIAD) indexed to body surface area (BSA) (EIAD-BSA) and access site complications in patients undergoing TAVI via transfemoral access (TF) (TF-TAVI).</p></sec><sec>Material and methods<p>Patients underwent TF-TAVI in 2017–2019 at the Upper-Silesian Medical Center in Katowice. Based on the preoperative multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT), pre-specified measurements of the ilio-femoral vessels were performed. The results were indexed to BSA and body mass index (BMI). Complications after TAVI were defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3). The primary outcome regarding the adverse events after TAVI was the composite of access site complications requiring surgical intervention or blood transfusion.</p></sec><sec>Results<p>The registry included 193 unselected patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Vascular and access-related complications including bleeding occurred in 17.1% of patients. Major TAVI access site complications (VARC-3) were reported in 5.7% of patients, while minor complications (VARC-3) occurred in 2.6%. EIAD-BSA demonstrated a positive correlation with the access site complications primary endpoint. Patients with greater EIAD-BSA had a numerically higher number of access site adverse events requiring surgical intervention or blood transfusion: n = 12 (5%) vs. n = 4 (4%), p = 0.011.</p></sec><sec>Conclusions<p>External iliac artery diameter indexed to BSA could be an underestimated indicator of unfavorable outcomes after TF-TAVI, predicting periprocedural access site complications.</p></sec>
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?