Similarities and Differences Between Study Addiction and Study Engagement and Work Addiction and Work Engagement: A Network Analysis

Piotr Bereznowski,Roman Konarski,Ståle Pallesen,Paweł A. Atroszko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-023-01234-4

IF: 8

2024-02-06

International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

Abstract:This study aimed to investigate the relationships between symptoms of study addiction and their relationships with dimensions of study engagement. We used two samples in which study addiction was measured with the Bergen Study Addiction Scale and study engagement was measured with the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students. The samples comprised Norwegian ( n = 1107) and Polish ( n = 776) students. The networks featured three clusters of nodes (two clusters of the study addiction symptoms and one cluster of the study engagement dimensions). Study addiction clusters were connected with study engagement cluster through positive edges between absorption and study addiction symptoms, negative edges which vigor shared with conflict and problems, and negative edge between dedication and mood modification. Among the symptoms of study addiction, problems, conflict, and withdrawal were the most central and salience, tolerance, and mood modification were the least central. Moreover, conflict was the most predictable and relapse was the least predictable symptom of study addiction. The results from the present study are similar to those of previous studies on work addiction and support the notion that study addiction may be a precursor to work addiction. Although based on cross-sectional data, the nuanced differences between work addiction and study addiction networks are discussed as they lay a foundation for further investigation of the potential differences in transition mechanisms from healthy engagement to compulsive behavior.

psychiatry,substance abuse,psychology, clinical

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore the relationship between study addiction and study engagement, and to investigate how these concepts manifest among Norwegian and Polish students using network analysis methods. Specifically, the research objectives include:

1. **Investigating whether the symptom structure of study addiction is similar to that of work addiction**: The authors hypothesize that the symptom structure of study addiction is similar to that of work addiction, which can be verified by observing the clustering of symptoms.

2. **Examining how various dimensions of study engagement are related to study addiction**: Furthermore, the authors aim to understand whether different aspects of study engagement (such as focus, dedication, and vigor) are related to study addiction in a manner similar to the relationship between work engagement and work addiction.

The research methods primarily involve using network analysis techniques to analyze data from student samples in two countries. The study results indicate:

- The symptoms of study addiction can be divided into two clusters: one containing tolerance, relapse, conflict, and problems; the other containing salience, mood modification, and withdrawal symptoms. This finding is similar to previous research results on work addiction.

- The relationship between different dimensions of study engagement and study addiction symptoms is also similar to the relationship between work engagement and work addiction, particularly the role of focus as a bridge in the transition from healthy study interest to study addiction.

In summary, this paper attempts to deepen our understanding of study addiction by comparing the similarities and differences between study addiction and work addiction, as well as the relationship between study engagement and study addiction. It also aims to lay the foundation for future research on the potential mechanisms underlying the transition from healthy study interest to compulsive behavior.