Aortic Stiffness Can be Predicted From Different eGFR Formulas With Long Follow-Up in the Malmö Diet Cancer Study

Anders Christensson,Simon Lundgren,Madeleine Johansson,Peter M. Nilsson,Gunnar Engström,Agne Laucyte-Cibulskiene
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197241232719
2024-02-11
Angiology
Abstract:Angiology, Ahead of Print. We studied the impact of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on either creatinine or cystatin C, or in combination, on vascular aging (aortic stiffness) and central hemodynamics (central systolic blood pressure) in a Swedish urban population with median 17 years of follow-up. Participants (n = 5049) from the population-based Malmö Diet and Cancer Study that underwent baseline examination and later participated in the prospective cardiovascular arm were selected. Of these, 2064 with measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and central blood pressure at follow-up were enrolled. eGFR was calculated using cystatin C (eGFRCYS) and creatinine (eGFRCR) equations: Caucasian, Asian, pediatric, and adult cohorts (CAPA), the Lund-Malmö revised (LMrev), and the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equations. Lower adjusted eGFRCR, but not eGFRCYS, were independently associated with higher cfPWV (P < .001, respectively). eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 determined higher cfPWV except when using the EKFC equation. Conversely, CAPA/LMrev and CAPA/EKFC ratios were not associated with aortic stiffness. Lower eGFRCR is associated with higher future aortic stiffness independently of age, sex, heart rate, mean blood pressure, body mass index, and antihypertensive treatment. The ratio of eGFRCYS and eGFRCR equations could not predict aortic stiffness at all.
peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?